Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club: Social Media Responses to the January 2014 Online Emergency Medicine Journal Club on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage∗

Multiple Wins: Embracing Technology to Increase Efficiency and Maximize Efforts

“…19,20 This series harnessed the power of Twitter conversations, live video chats with the study authors, and written discussions hosted on the ALiEM website to facilitate international virtual journal clubs discussing new and important publications. This approach allowed for both extensive scholarly discussion and dissemination of modern research, as well as partnership with the Annals of Emergency Medicine editorial staff to turn the discussion itself into a peer-reviewed and published product.…”

Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club: A Social Media Discussion About the Lack of Association Between Press Ganey Scores and Emergency Department Analgesia

“…[10][11][12] Our project may also have an English-language bias because this was the only language used in the materials. Although the Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club harnessed open-access multimedia platforms, the featured article was not open access.…”

Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club: A Social Media Discussion About the Outpatient Management of Patients With Spontaneous Pneumothorax by Using Pigtail Catheters

“…[1][2][3]12 This includes sampling bias because participants are more likely to be familiar with newer technology, interested in the topic, and willing to share opinions openly in a public forum. The Twitter analytics platform Symplur has limitations.…”

“…[1][2][3] In this journal club, we featured the 2014 article by Voisin et al 4 on the outpatient management of spontaneous pneumothorax by using small-bore pigtail catheters with Heimlich valves.…”