2001
DOI: 10.1525/tran.2001.10.2.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World

Abstract: Global Ethnography: Forces. Connections, and Imaginations in. Postmodern World. Michael Burawoy. Joseph A. Blum. Sheba George. Zsuzsa Gille. Teresa Gowan. Lynn Haney. Maren Klawiter. Steve H. Lopez. Seán Ó Riain. and Millie Thayer. Berkeley, CA. and London, UK: University of California Press, 2000. xv. 393 pp. (Paper US$17.95)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethnographic fieldwork was coupled with archival research comprising official policy documents, project reports and historical records mapping the hydrogeology of Lebanon. To overcome the spatial and temporal limitations of conventional ethnographies, I adopt a multi-scalar 'global ethnographic' approach (Burawoy et al, 2000) to examine how infrastructures become sites of 'encounter' and 'friction' (Tsing, 2005) wherein the operations of international development regimes and their structures of power, knowledge and capital are both manifested and contested. A multi-scalar ethnographic approach extends my analysis both spatially to capture these global macrostructural systems of knowledge, power and capital as well as the local granular, gritty and underground materiality, and temporally to examine the historically contingent production of local hydrogeologies.…”
Section: Mona Khneissermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethnographic fieldwork was coupled with archival research comprising official policy documents, project reports and historical records mapping the hydrogeology of Lebanon. To overcome the spatial and temporal limitations of conventional ethnographies, I adopt a multi-scalar 'global ethnographic' approach (Burawoy et al, 2000) to examine how infrastructures become sites of 'encounter' and 'friction' (Tsing, 2005) wherein the operations of international development regimes and their structures of power, knowledge and capital are both manifested and contested. A multi-scalar ethnographic approach extends my analysis both spatially to capture these global macrostructural systems of knowledge, power and capital as well as the local granular, gritty and underground materiality, and temporally to examine the historically contingent production of local hydrogeologies.…”
Section: Mona Khneissermentioning
confidence: 99%