2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2010.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global existence and maximal regularity of solutions of gradient systems

Abstract: In this article, we use a Galerkin method to prove a maximal regularity result for the following abstract gradient systemThis abstract result is applied to nonlinear diffusion equations and to nondegenerate quasilinear parabolic equations with nonlocal coefficients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the proof of this fact we invite the reader to see [2], Remarks 6 and 7. We note also, from assumption (A4), that we have for every (t, u)…”
Section: Functional Setting Assumptions and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the proof of this fact we invite the reader to see [2], Remarks 6 and 7. We note also, from assumption (A4), that we have for every (t, u)…”
Section: Functional Setting Assumptions and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We check that all assumptions of Theorem 2 are satisfied. The verification of assumption (A7) can be made as in [2], Proof of Corollary 10. As a consequence of Theorem 2, we obtain:…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we can consider fractional or nonlocal derivatives of any order σ ≤ s ≤ 1. This generalises the classical gradient, and is conceptually similar to the ideas of Boussandel (see [12] and [13]), where he considers the classical gradient weighted by a measure. For general operators A satisfying (2), the theorem applies with θ = 0 and σ < s ≤ 1.…”
Section: Example 1: Local Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Problem (3.2) admits a maximal solution u m ∈ W 1,2 loc ([0, T m ); V m ). P r o o f. See [7], Proof of Theorem 4, Part 1. Lemma 3.2.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…g = •, • H , problem (1.1) was considered in the literature; see for example [9], Theorem 6.1. When g depends further on the space variable, problem (1.1) was studied in [7], where the embedding V ֒→ H is supposed to be compact, the energy E is assumed to be H-elliptic (i.e., the functional u → E(u) + 1 2 ω u 2 H is convex and weakly coercive for some constant ω ∈ R) instead of convex and weakly coercive and the metric g satisfied some continuity condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%