2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00206-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global factors that determine the maximum disparity for seeing cyclopean surface shape

Abstract: A disparity gradient limit explains why the maximum amplitude of sinusoidal disparity gratings increases with decreasing disparity spatial frequency. It also explains why the largest disparity for binocular fusion (diplopia threshold) varies directly with stimulus element separation. Does a disparity gradient limit also apply to the detection of cyclopean shape? A previous study addressed this question and concluded that it does not. We examined this question by measuring the largest disparity amplitude (d max… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, when temporal frequency was 0 Hz, the upper limit was reached whenever the disparity changed by Ͼ1.2°for every 1°change in spatial position. This is very consistent with previous estimates of a spatial disparity-gradient limit (Tyler, 1973;Burt and Julesz, 1980;Ziegler et al, 2000;Filippini and Banks, 2009) and not consistent with an amplitude limit. The spatial disparity-gradient limit is a byproduct of using windowed correlation to estimate disparity ( .…”
Section: Upper-disparity Limitssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, when temporal frequency was 0 Hz, the upper limit was reached whenever the disparity changed by Ͼ1.2°for every 1°change in spatial position. This is very consistent with previous estimates of a spatial disparity-gradient limit (Tyler, 1973;Burt and Julesz, 1980;Ziegler et al, 2000;Filippini and Banks, 2009) and not consistent with an amplitude limit. The spatial disparity-gradient limit is a byproduct of using windowed correlation to estimate disparity ( .…”
Section: Upper-disparity Limitssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Sinusoidal corrugations in random-element stereograms cannot be discriminated when the product of corrugation spatial frequency and disparity amplitude exceeds a critical value (Tyler, 1974, 1975; Ziegler, Hess, & Kingdom, 2000). A similar phenomenon was observed by Burt and Julesz (1980) who reported that two-element stereograms cannot be fused when the angular separation between the elements is less than the disparity.…”
Section: The Disparity-gradient Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As corrugation frequency increases, the stimulus can exceed the disparity gradient limit, and this could cause a failure in disparity measurement (Ziegler et al, 2000). The disparity gradient varies across a sinusoidal disparity waveform, but is proportional to corrugation frequency.…”
Section: Effect Of Disparity Gradientmentioning
confidence: 99%