We explore the equimultiplicity theory of the F -invariants Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity, F -signature, Frobenius Betti numbers, and Frobenius Euler characteristic over strongly F -regular rings. Techniques introduced in this article provide a unified approach to the study of these F -invariants under localization and as measurements of singularities.Then R is regular if and only if F e * R is a free R-module for some (equivalently, all) e ∈ N. Motivated by Kunz's theorem it is natural to study non-regular prime characteristic rings by studying algebraic, geometric, and homological properties of the family of R-modules {F e * R} e∈N which distinguish R from a regular local ring. To study the family of R-modules {F e * R} e∈N we consider the following measurements:(1) µ(F e * R), the minimal number of generators of F e * R as an R-module;(2) a e (R), the largest rank of a free summand of F e * R;. The asymptotic ratio of the above numbers as compared with the rank of F e * R produces several interesting and important numerical invariants unique to rings of prime characteristic.(1) Hilbert-Kunz multiplicity: e. This article concerns itself with the equimultiplicity theory of the above numerical invariants, a topic initiated by the second author in [Smi19]. Specifically, we are interested in understanding when the above measurements are unchanged under localization. Our main result in this direction is the following:Polstra was supported in part by NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowship DMS #1703856.Lemma 2.3. Suppose (R, m, k) is an F -finite local ring of prime characteristic p > 0 and Krull dimension d. Let a ⊂ R an ideal. Then the sequence of ideals {I e (a)} satisfy the following properties:(1) I e (a) is an ideal;(2) a [p e ] ⊆ I e (a);(3) I e (a) [p] ⊆ I e+1 (a); (4) ϕ(F e 0 * I e+e 0 (a)) ⊆ I e (a) for every e, e 0 ∈ N and ϕ ∈ Hom R (F e 0 * R, R); (5) If a is m-primary then the limit s(a) := lim e→∞ λ(R/Ie(a)) p ed exists and λ(R/I e (a)) = s(a)p ed + O(p e(d−1) ). The value s(a) is referred to as the F -signature of a; (6) If W is a multiplicative set then I e (a)R W = I e (aR W ); (7) I e (a : J) = I e (a) : J [p e ] for all ideals J; (8) If P is a prime ideal then I e (P ) is P -primary; (9) If x ∈ R is regular element of R/a then x is regular element of R/I e (a) for every e ∈ N; (10) If R is a regular local ring then I e (a) = a [p e ] for every e ∈ N; (11) If b ⊆ R is an ideal and a ⊆ b then I e (a) ⊆ I e (b); Proof. The proofs of (1)-(4) are straightforward and are left to the reader. Statement (5) then follows by [PT18, Corollary 4.5]. To prove (6) it is enough to observe Hom R (F e * R, R) W ∼ = Hom R W (F e * R W , R W ). For (7) we note that a ∈ I e (a : J) if and only if for all ϕ ∈ Hom R (F e * R, R) we have ϕ(F e * a) ∈ (a : J), or equivalently, ϕ(F e * J [p e ] a) = Jϕ(F e * a) ⊆ a. Statements (8) and (9) easily follows from (7). Observation (10) follows from Theorem 1.1; if F e * R is free then it is then easy see that F e * I e (a) = aF e * R from which it follows I e (a) = a [p e ] . Property ...