2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Genetic Networks and the Genotype-to-Phenotype Relationship

Abstract: Genetic interactions identify combinations of genetic variants that impinge on phenotype. With whole-genome sequence information available for thousands of individuals within a species, a major outstanding issue concerns the interpretation of allelic combinations of genes underlying inherited traits. In this review, we discuss how large-scale analyses in model systems have illuminated the general principles and phenotypic impact of genetic interactions. We focus on studies in budding yeast, including the mappi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
164
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(256 reference statements)
4
164
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, recent work has illustrated the power of such screens in identifying new vulnerabilities to PARP and ATR inhibitors as well as to agents like temozolomide, a DNA alkylator (Hustedt et al, 2019a;MacLeod et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2018;Zimmermann et al, 2018). However, as these screens were carried out in isolation, they do not provide a global view of the human DNA damage response nor are they amenable to gene function inference by methods such as genetic interaction similarity profiling (Costanzo et al, 2019). We therefore aimed to map a genetic network of the response to DNA lesions and genotoxic agents, by undertaking 28 genome-scale CRISPR screens in an immortalized human diploid cell line (RPE-1 hTERT) that assessed the response to a wide variety of genotoxic agents that include multiple cancer therapeutics such as ionizing radiation, camptothecin, cisplatin and doxorubicin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, recent work has illustrated the power of such screens in identifying new vulnerabilities to PARP and ATR inhibitors as well as to agents like temozolomide, a DNA alkylator (Hustedt et al, 2019a;MacLeod et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2018;Zimmermann et al, 2018). However, as these screens were carried out in isolation, they do not provide a global view of the human DNA damage response nor are they amenable to gene function inference by methods such as genetic interaction similarity profiling (Costanzo et al, 2019). We therefore aimed to map a genetic network of the response to DNA lesions and genotoxic agents, by undertaking 28 genome-scale CRISPR screens in an immortalized human diploid cell line (RPE-1 hTERT) that assessed the response to a wide variety of genotoxic agents that include multiple cancer therapeutics such as ionizing radiation, camptothecin, cisplatin and doxorubicin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic mapping of GIs in model organisms like yeast has provided a detailed view into the functional organisation of eukaryotic cells (Costanzo et al , 2019). Recent advances in CRISPR-based genome engineering technologies provide a path for similar systematic GI studies in human cells (Horlbeck et al , 2018; Najm et al , 2018; Han et al , 2017; Norman et al , 2019; Shen et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementation of gene functions by human homologs, and vice versa , has demonstrated evolutionary conservation of gene functions [285-287]. Like their basic functions, gene interactions are conserved [288,289] and yeast is unique in its capability to address complex genetic interactions experimentally [290]. Here, we model how yeast phenomic assessment of gene-drug interaction could be employed as part of a precision oncology paradigm to predict efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy based on the unique cancer genetic profiles of individual patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%