2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11558-011-9133-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global governance behind closed doors: The IMF boardroom, the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility, and the intersection of material power and norm stabilisation in global politics

Abstract: Up on the 12th floor of its 19th Street Headquarters, the IMF Board sits in active session for an average of 7 hours per week. Although key matters of policy are decided on in the venue, the rules governing Boardroom interactions remain opaque, resting on an uneasy combination of consensual decision-making and weighted voting. Through a detailed analysis of IMF Board discussions surrounding the Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF), this article sheds light on the mechanics of power in this often over… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proliferation of different lending arrangements that countries can access based on their level of economic development and the type of economic challenges they face has institutionalized the principle of differential treatment based on borrowers' resource needs and repayment abilities (IMF ). This has expanded the potential for programs to be tailored to local economic circumstances without attracting charges of IMF favoritism (Broome ; Clegg ). There is nonetheless a thin line between differential treatment based on borrowers' resource needs and preferential treatment based on their systemic importance (Pop‐Eleches ).…”
Section: Continuity and Change In Imf Policy Advice To Borrowersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proliferation of different lending arrangements that countries can access based on their level of economic development and the type of economic challenges they face has institutionalized the principle of differential treatment based on borrowers' resource needs and repayment abilities (IMF ). This has expanded the potential for programs to be tailored to local economic circumstances without attracting charges of IMF favoritism (Broome ; Clegg ). There is nonetheless a thin line between differential treatment based on borrowers' resource needs and preferential treatment based on their systemic importance (Pop‐Eleches ).…”
Section: Continuity and Change In Imf Policy Advice To Borrowersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bureaucratic culture is indeed regarded as one of the primary factors that helps to explain why IOs have difficulties in adapting their policies to changed economic and political circumstances (Barnett and Finnemore 2004; Momani 2007). As Liam Clegg (2011) notes, ‘the dominant “bureaucratic culture” serves to fix the “points of reference” around which discussions of policy reform take place.’ Bureaucratic inertia, usually associated with deference towards the preferences of the most powerful shareholders, usually prevents change from occurring in the international financial institutions (Babb 2013). This constraint leads to a dynamic of change that follows the punctuated model: stasis prevails until some event—be it new recruitment (Chwieroth 2008) or a new leadership (Weaver 2008, 108)—ruptures the status quo and pushes new and alternative ideas into the debate.…”
Section: Agents Institutions and Ideational Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research could clarify why the IMF's position as regards domestic creditors has been an instance of continuity. Of relevance here could be research on principal–agent politics at the board level (Clegg ), the role of staff research (Ban ; Broome and Seabrooke ; Chwieroth ; Seabrooke ), or some combination of the two (Gallagher ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%