1994
DOI: 10.4153/cmb-1994-045-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Hypoellipticity of a Class of Second Order Operators

Abstract: We show that almost all perturbations P — λ, λ € C, of an arbitrary constant coefficient partial differential operator P are globally hypoelliptic on the torus. We also give a characterization of the values λ € C for which the operator is globally hypoelliptic; in particular, we show that the addition of a term of order zero may destroy the property of global hypoellipticity of operators of principal type, contrary to that happens with the usual (local) hypoellipticity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and thus L is not globally hypoelliptic if and only if one of the numbers α j is either a rational or Liouville. It can be noted here that this example recaptures results in [13].…”
Section: Operators With Constant Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…and thus L is not globally hypoelliptic if and only if one of the numbers α j is either a rational or Liouville. It can be noted here that this example recaptures results in [13].…”
Section: Operators With Constant Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…EXAMPLE 2. Now we take $p=p(t)$ a real symbol that satisfies (1) and the additional condition: $|p(1)|>2$ or $|p(1)|=1$ . $(^{*})$ Then, we have the operators $p(D_{1}^{2})+e^{2ix_{1}}+ae^{-2ix_{1}},$ $a=\pm 1$ , which are (GH) on $T^{n}$ ; indeed, we can show that $0<|t_{1}|\leq 1$ and this implies $t_{1}^{2}+2a_{1,0}t_{1}+$ $a_{1,0}^{2}+1\neq 0$ , which, in tum, is shown to be equivalent to $t_{1}+\tilde{t}_{1}+a_{1,0}\neq 0$ .…”
Section: The Main Theorem and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under hypothesis (1), we present a necessary and sufflcient condition for the operators in (1) to be (GH). Our examples show, in particular, that in the case when $p(t)=\lambda t^{2},1<\lambda<2$ , the situation $m>1$ is different from the case $m=1$ , (see [5]); namely, when $m>1$ , the operator may fail to be (GH).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations