The 'political economy of industrialization' in mixed economies has been a key concern of Development and Change right from the start, as will be clear from this collection of 22 articles, published in the journal between 1970 and 2015.All papers analyse what government should and should not do -and, more importantly, what government can do to foster industrial development within the constraints and contradictions imposed by domestic political alignments and the global capitalist order. The 22 papers in this virtual issue are grouped under three broad headings: (1) varieties of industrialization experiences; (2) the macroeconomics of industrialization; and (3) state capitalism and industrialization. This introductory essay discusses the main themes of each grouping and justifies why the papers have been included by highlighting how each one engages with the main themes and what lessons it holds for industrialization now.
INDUSTRIALIZATION DEBATES THEN AND NOWTwo lengthy articles published in the Forum 2015 issue of Development and Change, by Andrew Fischer and Servaas Storm, revisit major debates since the 1940s and 1950s on industrial development and appropriate industrialization strategies in national and international contexts (Fischer, 2015;Storm, 2015). One key message coming out of these articles is that successful late-industrializing countries all feature 'activist' or 'developmental' states which -by going against capitalist logic and static comparative advantage -overtly mobilized resources and helped steer resource allocation to shape their country's future comparative advantage. The debate on how to industrialize in a 'mixed' economy, in other words, pivots on the politicaleconomy issue of what government should and should not do -and, even more importantly, on the question of what government can do to fosterThe author is grateful to Bridget O'Laughlin and Ashwani Saith for their comments.Development and Change 00(0): 1-19.