2018
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.118.036312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Impact of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The hazard ratio for CVD for patients with BP in this range was reported as 1.5‐2.0 in Korea, similar to the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines . However, the 2018 Korean hypertension guidelines (now in press) have not adopted the 130/80 mm Hg threshold . Instead, the role of out‐of‐office BP measurement is highlighted, in particular to diagnose masked and determine the requirement for pharmacologic treatment; the rate of masked hypertension in patients with BP 130‐139/80‐89 mm Hg was reported to be about 30%, and using atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk calculator, only minority are indicated for pharmacologic treatment in Korea .…”
Section: Positioning Of Hbpm In the 2018 Korean Hypertension Managemementioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The hazard ratio for CVD for patients with BP in this range was reported as 1.5‐2.0 in Korea, similar to the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines . However, the 2018 Korean hypertension guidelines (now in press) have not adopted the 130/80 mm Hg threshold . Instead, the role of out‐of‐office BP measurement is highlighted, in particular to diagnose masked and determine the requirement for pharmacologic treatment; the rate of masked hypertension in patients with BP 130‐139/80‐89 mm Hg was reported to be about 30%, and using atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk calculator, only minority are indicated for pharmacologic treatment in Korea .…”
Section: Positioning Of Hbpm In the 2018 Korean Hypertension Managemementioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, the 2018 Korean hypertension guidelines (now in press) have not adopted the 130/80 mm Hg threshold . Instead, the role of out‐of‐office BP measurement is highlighted, in particular to diagnose masked and determine the requirement for pharmacologic treatment; the rate of masked hypertension in patients with BP 130‐139/80‐89 mm Hg was reported to be about 30%, and using atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk calculator, only minority are indicated for pharmacologic treatment in Korea . However, there are no data regarding the degree of overlap between high‐risk ASCVD patients and masked hypertension in that BP range.…”
Section: Positioning Of Hbpm In the 2018 Korean Hypertension Managemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on all these differences between Asians and Caucasians, is there any merit in recommending and adopting the lower BP threshold for diagnosis and treatment target in Asia? Although the cardiovascular risk profile of Asian patients with hypertension means that it makes theoretical sense to lower diagnostic and therapeutic BP thresholds, there are currently no data from robust randomized clinical trials for the benefits of the lower targets in preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and reducing cardiovascular risk, particularly in high‐risk patients and especially not in Asian populations . This was the rationale cited by a number of Asian countries for leaving current guidelines unchanged for the time being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In November 2017, these organizations introduced another change in the threshold for diagnosing hypertension and the treatment target, reducing it by 10 mm Hg to a BP of ≥130/80 mm Hg . This new lower BP threshold has caused a lot of ongoing debate, not only in the United States but also throughout the world …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%