Global Inventory and Similarity Rating of Singing Voice Assessment Terms Used at English Speaking Academic Institutions

Hausknecht, Josipa Bainac; Murdaugh, Kristen; Nagl, Elke; Herbst, Christian T.

doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.08.020

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Bourne & Kenny, 2016;LeBorgne et al, 2010), or compare expert evaluations of classical singing with acoustic measurements (e.g., Ekholm et al, 1998;Sonninen et al, 2005). The sheer complexity of the task of singing description and evaluation is also due to the ambiguity of terms used to describe singing (Hausknecht, et al, 2021;Mitchell & MacDonald, 2012). In a rare example of evaluation of CCM singing, one study investigated the evaluation of pronunciation using an online corpus of solo karaoke performances of popular songs, but this research was more concerned with developing a strategy for automatic evaluation of sung pronunciation than with overall evaluations of singing quality (Gupta et al, 2018).…”

Section: Abstract: Singing Perception Performance Quality Singing Sty...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Descriptions and Evaluations of "Good Singing" in the Age of 'The Voice'

Forbes¹,

Krause²,

Lowe-Brown³

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What constitutes “good singing” can be hotly contested amongst singing voice pedagogues, yet little is known about what the general public considers to be “good singing”. Within a program of research on musical identity and singing self-concept, this mixed-methods pilot study considered how members of the public (N = 52) described and evaluated stylistically different versions of a sung melody to test a hypothesis that reality TV singing may be deemed as “good singing”. Participants were exposed to three versions of “Happy Birthday”: 1) amateurs singing “as they would normally sing”; 2) professionals performing a “plain” version; 3) the same professionals singing an embellished version in the style of The Voice reality TV show. Results indicate that both professional versions were considered “better singing” than the amateur singing. While respondents focused on the technical deficiencies for amateurs, descriptions of the professionals concerned style. Stated exemplars of “good singing” were split between the two professional versions—based on sophistication and creativity (“professional: embellished”) or vocal quality (“professional: plain”). While respondents’ preferred version largely matched their chosen exemplar of “good singing”, participants were more likely to sing along with the “amateur” version. Implications for singing voice pedagogy and engagement in singing activities for wellbeing are considered.

show abstract