Global Justice between Minimalism and Egalitarianism

Armstrong, Chris

doi:10.1177/0090591713499724

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2014

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…I emphasize this fundamental agreement by reserving the term ‘cosmopolitan’ for those who share a commitment to what I’ve called the ‘core tenet of cosmopolitanism’; I use the terms ‘Extender’ and ‘Restricter’ for those who differ about the scope of egalitarian distributive principles (cf. Armstrong’s (2014) distinction between ‘egalitarians’ and ‘minimalists’).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cosmopolitanism and Competition: Probing the Limits of Egalitarian Justice

Wiens¹

2016

Economics and Philosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This paper develops a novel competition criterion for evaluating institutional schemes. Roughly, this criterion says that one institutional scheme is normatively superior to another to the extent that the former would engender more widespread political competition than the latter. I show that this criterion should be endorsed by both global egalitarians and their statist rivals, as it follows from their common commitment to the moral equality of all persons.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%