Global markets for technology: Evidence from patent transactions

Marco, Antonio De; Scellato, Giuseppe; Ughetto, Elisa; Caviggioli, Federico

doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.015

Cited by 68 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Through these works, a large number of inter‐ or intra‐regional technology transfer issues (e.g., networks, determinants, and effects) predominantly in national scope were revealed (Drivas & Economidou, ; Wang, Pan, Ning, Li, & Chen, ; Zhang et al, ). A surprising finding, which is different from what is found for research at the organization level, is that databases at the regional level were consistently based on the patent transactions including licensing or transferring (Marco et al, ; Sun, ; Sun & Cao, ; Sun & Grimes, ). Unfortunately, we have not observed any studies at the city level so far.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 78%

“…In the process of transformation, many scholars believed that the U.S. Bayh‐Dole Act greatly promoted university technology transfer (Aldridge & Audretsch, ; Shane, ). Other scholars discovered that geographic proximity played an important role in technology transfer between regions (Boschma, ; Ibert, Hautala, & Jauhiainen, ; Marco, Scellato, Ughetto, & Caviggioli, ; Sun & Grimes, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The faster the better? Economic effects of the speed of inter‐city technology transfer in China

Duan

Grimes

2019

Growth and Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although existing studies questioned the simple positive correlation between the technology transfer speed and the benefits, they have been widely condemned for lacking empirical evidence. Using the patent transfer data at the city scale in China, and distinguishing fast from slow by dividing technology transfer speed into four levels, this paper attempts to answer the question in terms of city economic growth, which is whether the faster is the better. Panel regression results show that for economic growth of city, the speed of technology transfer does not mean that faster is better. In other words, technology transfer maintaining a relatively rapid speed (more than 1 year and less than 2 years) can promote city economic growth, although the evidence is weak.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 78%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The faster the better? Economic effects of the speed of inter‐city technology transfer in China

Duan

Grimes

2019

Growth and Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These records provide the 'source-sink' relationship (or origin and destination) of patent right flows. Consequently, patent transactions offer a useful perspective to explore spatial connections of interregional technology transfers [40,54]. From the date of application, every change in the owner of a patent is recorded in detail in the patent's legal status (patent application number, patent name, patent classification number, assignor and address, assignee and address, patent application time, patent grant time, and patent transfer time) by China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) (http://www.cnipa.gov.cn/).…”

Section: Data Sources and Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatial Dynamics of Intercity Technology Transfer Networks in China’s Three Urban Agglomerations: A Patent Transaction Perspective

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technology transfer has become a vital pipeline for acquiring external knowledge. The purpose of this paper is to portray the spatial dynamics of intercity technology transfer networks in China’s three urban agglomerations based on patent right transaction data from 2008 to 2015. The integration of social networks and spatial visualization is used to explore spatial networks and influencing variables of the networks. The results demonstrate that Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen are emerging as hubs in the three urban agglomerations. The spatial distributions of degree and weighted degree are significantly heterogeneous and hierarchical. The larger cities play the role of a knowledge and technology incubator, highly related to their economic scale, research and development (R&D) input, and innovation output. The evolution of intercity technology linkages is driven by the networking mechanisms of preferential attachment, hierarchical and contagious diffusion, path dependence, and path breaking. Moreover, we found that the geographical proximity and technology gaps are determinants of the strength of intercity technology linkages. As a result, it has been discovered that the network in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei agglomeration is organized in a tree network, while the Yangtze River Delta features a polycentric network and the Pearl River Delta has multi-star characteristics.

show abstract

“…Several studies have contributed to this emerging stream of literature, most of them focusing on the market for US patents (e.g. De Marco et al 2017;Galasso et al 2013). Literature on EPs is scarcer (see Bö senberg and Egger 2017; Ciaramella et al 2017 for notable exceptions).…”

Section: Measuring Technology Transfer With Patent Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Sources of Knowledge Flow Between Developed and Developing Nations

Rassenfosse

Seliger

2018

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article provides a long-term view on the sources of knowledge flow between developed and developing nations. It relies on patent data to explore three potential sources: R&D collaboration, technology sourcing, and technology transfer. All three sources provide a very consistent message. First, knowledge flows from East Asia, particularly China, are occurring more frequently. Second, knowledge flows are increasingly concentrated in information and communication technologies. Third, the USA and Canada had traditionally larger patenting activity with Asia than Europe, but the share of activity between Europe and Asia has been increasing in recent years. Larger patenting activity between the USA and Canada and Asia implies that North America is more likely to benefit from the reverse knowledge flows than Europe as China progresses toward becoming a technological leader.

show abstract

Global markets for technology: Evidence from patent transactions

Cited by 68 publications

References 45 publications

The faster the better? Economic effects of the speed of inter‐city technology transfer in China

The faster the better? Economic effects of the speed of inter‐city technology transfer in China

Spatial Dynamics of Intercity Technology Transfer Networks in China’s Three Urban Agglomerations: A Patent Transaction Perspective

Sources of Knowledge Flow Between Developed and Developing Nations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About