2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Meta-analysis of Urine Microbiome: Colonization of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon–degrading Bacteria Among Bladder Cancer Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2019, Liu et al. (2019) identified high expression of Ralstonia in BCa tissues, and meanwhile, the presence of Ralstonia in BCa was similarly highlighted in a recent study by Bukavina et al. (2023) Sphingomonas is widely present in the environment and has an environmental restorative role ( Asaf et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In 2019, Liu et al. (2019) identified high expression of Ralstonia in BCa tissues, and meanwhile, the presence of Ralstonia in BCa was similarly highlighted in a recent study by Bukavina et al. (2023) Sphingomonas is widely present in the environment and has an environmental restorative role ( Asaf et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Compared with catheterized urines, BCa washouts showed specific increases of some taxa, such as Burkholderiaceae , whereas midstream urine was enriched with Streptococcus . In the same way, Bukavina et al [17] demonstrated that catheterized urine samples showed lower genera variability combined with a lower contamination than voided urine samples. Thus, to explore the urobiome, many scientists prefer the use of urine samples from a urethral catheter [21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Owing to the absence of standardized urine sample collection, common investigation procedures, and assessment of intra- and interindividual variability [16] , it is not surprising to find conflicting data in urobiome studies. In fact, a recent global meta-analysis of urine microbiome reported that the type of urine collection methodology biased the genera abundance because of skin, vaginal, and urethral contamination in the first-morning (FM) catch samples [17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to accomplish this, the initial steps such as sample collection and sample preparation are of uttermost importance. Sample collection for the urinary microbiome can be troublesome as the most common and only noninvasive method, midstream urine sampling, can become contaminated from surrounding areas of the urethra, skin and genital tract; and thus, create unreliable/contaminated taxonomic profiles and lead to term genitourinary/urogenital microbiota for microbial communities obtained from voided urine samples in females [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Urogenital Microbiomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the composition of the urogenital microbiota varies between individuals and can be influenced by factors such as age, sex, diet and health status [ 8 , 9 ]. Changes in composition of endogenous urinary microbiota have been commonly associated with urinary tract infection, but it has also been correlated with kidney stones, incontinence, bladder cancer, prostate inflammation and cancer, among other things [ 29 , 37 , 38 ]. Since most of this insight comes from high-throughput DNA sequencing efforts, it is not actual microorganisms that are being observed, but instead it is their DNA fragments these conclusions have been drawn upon.…”
Section: Urogenital Microbiomementioning
confidence: 99%