2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global observation of EKC hypothesis for CO2, SO and NO emission: A policy understanding for climate change mitigation in Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, this study supported the work of Zoundi (2017), who found that a higher level of income contributes to higher CO 2 e. The current estimates demonstrated a positive and significant relationship between income and CO 2 e in the panel. This finding validates prior findings for India (Usman, Iorember, & Olanipekun, 2019); Bangladesh (Danesh Miah, Farhad Hossain Masum, & Koike, 2010); Indonesia (Sugiawan & Managi, 2018); Iran (Esmaeili & Nasrnia, 2014); Japan (Abdulrashid, 2016); Malaysia (Ali, Abdullah, & Azam, 2017); and (Ozcan, Apergis, & Shahbaz, 2018). Fourth, the results also indicated that a significant association exists between fossil‐fuels use and CO 2 e, where a 1% rise in energy use increased CO 2 e (per capita) by 1.148%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Third, this study supported the work of Zoundi (2017), who found that a higher level of income contributes to higher CO 2 e. The current estimates demonstrated a positive and significant relationship between income and CO 2 e in the panel. This finding validates prior findings for India (Usman, Iorember, & Olanipekun, 2019); Bangladesh (Danesh Miah, Farhad Hossain Masum, & Koike, 2010); Indonesia (Sugiawan & Managi, 2018); Iran (Esmaeili & Nasrnia, 2014); Japan (Abdulrashid, 2016); Malaysia (Ali, Abdullah, & Azam, 2017); and (Ozcan, Apergis, & Shahbaz, 2018). Fourth, the results also indicated that a significant association exists between fossil‐fuels use and CO 2 e, where a 1% rise in energy use increased CO 2 e (per capita) by 1.148%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Most research finds an inverted-U-shaped EKC relationship between carbon emissions and income (Atasoy, 2017;Cheng et al, 2017;Shahbaz et al, 2020;Yao et al, 2019;You and Lv, 2018). Nevertheless, some suggest that the EKC hypothesis is invalid, which may be an insignificant impact (Erdoğan et al, 2020) or appears a different type of curve (Bali̇n and Akan, 2015;Danesh Miah et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another set of studies reported mixed evidence relating to the EKC hypothesis due to variations in country dynamics and the type of pollution measures taken [20,21]. Miah et al [22] argued that global literature on EKC hypothesis provides mixed results depending upon the type of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions taken as a measure of environmental degradation in empirical research. Marsiglio, Ansuategi and Gallastegui [8] argued that the negative relationship between pollution and income level, as suggested by the EKC hypothesis, is a short-term phenomenon, and that pollution may increase in the long run, generating an N-shaped curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%