Global occupational health research methods education

Jensen, Olaf Chresten; Flores, Agnes; Canals, María Luisa; Lucas, David; Denisenko, Ilona; Lucero‐Prisno, Don Eliseo; Corman, Victoria

doi:10.1016/j.mex.2021.101436

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Di culties using softwares like excel, endnote, Zotero and SPSS were highly reported. Lack of training in research methods is a major obstacle to scienti c publishing for junior scientists 22 . Logistic di culties were reported by non-French-speaking countries.…”

Section: Impact Of Specialty and Number Of Years Of Education On Scie...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Access to science for junior doctors and neurologists in French-speaking countries: challenges and future perspectives

Ali

Lanore

Mamadou

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objectives: Science education developed historically from experimentation science to model theories of cognition. Digitization in medical science brought about new challenges of access to science for education and publishing. The aims of our study are to describe the differences in access to science and scientific publications for junior doctors and neurologists in French-speaking countries, and to identify difficulties and their association with demographic, workplace, social and personal factors.Methods: We performed a thirty-nine-question-survey to define access to science from two major perspectives, scientific education, and scientific publishing. We explored scientific education through demographic data and scientific resources (institutional, online, personal), and evaluated scientific publishing of thesis and articles according to demographic data, number of publications, and difficulties with publishing.Results: Our study identified personal and environmental factors interfering with scientific access, some of which are attributed to junior doctors and neurologists in French-speaking countries as age, gender, ethnicity, income and work and life-balance. A heavier load was observed for African scientists. The main scientific resources used for medical education were Journals 82,9%, Congresses 79,4%, and Sci-Hub 74,5%. Junior scientists are facing major difficulties in writing in science due to linguistic (56,5%), financial (64,7%), scientific (55,3%), and logistic (65,3%) factors.Conclusions: This paper suggests that ethnicity, age, gender, and work-life balance can all impact access to science at different levels. The challenge now is to create digital platforms that modernize medical education and help build bridges for research within diverse scientific communities.

show abstract

Section: Impact Of Specialty and Number Of Years Of Education On Scie...mentioning

confidence: 99%