2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-197762/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global optimization of an encapsulated Si/SiO2 L3 cavity with a 43 million quality factor

Abstract: We optimize a silica-encapsulated silicon L3 photonic crystal cavity for ultra-high quality factor by means of a global optimization strategy, where the closest holes surrounding the cavity are varied to minimize out-of-plane losses. We find an optimal value of Qc = 4.33 × 107 , which is predicted to be in the 2 million regime in presence of structural imperfections compatible with state-of-the-art silicon fabrication tolerances.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to a significantly lower number of simulations needed to obtain an optimal structure. For comparison, a recent work reports on the application of GME to a similar cavity design by using a global optimization procedure on a comparable number of parameters, which converged to a result that is comparable with ours (18 times larger Q but 3.5 times larger V , in a structure with a slightly larger refractive index contrast in ref ). Crucially, the global optimization required 800 000 evaluations, while our gradient-based optimization converges after 131 function and gradient evaluations (equivalent to 262 forward-only evaluations in terms of computational time), which highlights the computational advantage of AD for this problem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This leads to a significantly lower number of simulations needed to obtain an optimal structure. For comparison, a recent work reports on the application of GME to a similar cavity design by using a global optimization procedure on a comparable number of parameters, which converged to a result that is comparable with ours (18 times larger Q but 3.5 times larger V , in a structure with a slightly larger refractive index contrast in ref ). Crucially, the global optimization required 800 000 evaluations, while our gradient-based optimization converges after 131 function and gradient evaluations (equivalent to 262 forward-only evaluations in terms of computational time), which highlights the computational advantage of AD for this problem.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This is fundamentally linked to the use of finite-difference frequency-domain simulations, which have significant difficulties in resolving sharp resonances that shift in frequency during the course of optimization. In contrast, global optimization methods using the GME have already proven extremely useful when applied to PhC cavities, ,,, both, because of the speed of the individual computation and because high- Q resonances actually represent the condition under which the approximation of the method works best. Here, we have moved one step further, leveraging our differentiable implementation of GME to perform a gradient-based optimization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,60 Of particular importance will be development of an optimization routine that reduces the computation time needed to evaluate the cavity Q for the geometry in each iteration; methods such as machine learning and guided mode expansion may be useful in this respect. 41,60 Finally, we note that this design can be expanded to include more than two regions of independent local electric field tunability separated by monolithic cuts. A good starting point for such a design may be a waveguide structure that takes advantage of periodic boundary conditions and optimized waveguide ends.…”
Section: Phc Cavity Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%