2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0096-3003(03)00200-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global optimization of signomial geometric programming using linear relaxation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For Example 23, the optimal solution ðx 1 ; x 2 ; x 3 Þ ¼ ð0:000000001; 0:5; 0:333333333Þ with our method satisfies the feasible region, but our optimal value À1:246913579 is much better than the optimal value À0:7955 in [32], thereby illustrating the robustness of our approach in finding a global optimal solution. In summary, compared with other methods [9,[19][20][21]32,[38][39][40], Tables 1-4 show that for Examples 1-24, the branch and bound algorithm yielded the -global optimal solutions with much better or at least the same objective function values. Excluding Examples 8, 14 and 17, Tables 2 and 4 show that the proposed algorithm improved the computational efficiency greatly, i.e., the time required to execute the algorithm was reduced significantly based on the number of iterations.…”
Section: Example 16mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For Example 23, the optimal solution ðx 1 ; x 2 ; x 3 Þ ¼ ð0:000000001; 0:5; 0:333333333Þ with our method satisfies the feasible region, but our optimal value À1:246913579 is much better than the optimal value À0:7955 in [32], thereby illustrating the robustness of our approach in finding a global optimal solution. In summary, compared with other methods [9,[19][20][21]32,[38][39][40], Tables 1-4 show that for Examples 1-24, the branch and bound algorithm yielded the -global optimal solutions with much better or at least the same objective function values. Excluding Examples 8, 14 and 17, Tables 2 and 4 show that the proposed algorithm improved the computational efficiency greatly, i.e., the time required to execute the algorithm was reduced significantly based on the number of iterations.…”
Section: Example 16mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…min x 2 À 3x 1 s:t: x 2 þ 5x 1 6 36; Àx 2 þ 0:25x 1 6 À1; 2x 2 2 À 2x 0:5 2 þ 11x 2 þ 8x 1 À 39 À 2x 0:5 1 x 2 2 þ 0:1x 1:5 1 x 1:5 2 6 0; 1 6 x 1 6 7; 1 6 x 2 6 7: [19] (1.000000000, 100.000000000) À1.990000000 [20] (1.000000000, 100.000000000) À1.990000000 Method of [21] (1.000000000, 100.000000000) À1.990000000 …”
Section: Example 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nonconvex quadratic programming problems are worthy of study because they frequently appear in many applied field of science and technology [1][2][3][4][5]. Many other nonlinear optimization problems can be converted into this form, for example, integer programming problems, quadratic 0-1 planning problems, assignment problems, the bilinear programming problems, linear complementarity problems, maximum and minimum problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maranas and Floudas [7] gave a global optimization algorithm of (SGP) based on the convex relaxation. By using linear relaxation, Shen and Zhang [8] gave a method for finding global minimum of (SGP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%