“…For Example 23, the optimal solution ðx 1 ; x 2 ; x 3 Þ ¼ ð0:000000001; 0:5; 0:333333333Þ with our method satisfies the feasible region, but our optimal value À1:246913579 is much better than the optimal value À0:7955 in [32], thereby illustrating the robustness of our approach in finding a global optimal solution. In summary, compared with other methods [9,[19][20][21]32,[38][39][40], Tables 1-4 show that for Examples 1-24, the branch and bound algorithm yielded the -global optimal solutions with much better or at least the same objective function values. Excluding Examples 8, 14 and 17, Tables 2 and 4 show that the proposed algorithm improved the computational efficiency greatly, i.e., the time required to execute the algorithm was reduced significantly based on the number of iterations.…”