2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0759-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global plant–symbiont organization and emergence of biogeochemical cycles resolved by evolution-based trait modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

13
110
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
13
110
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, AMF lack or have only limited enzymatic capacities to degrade organic compounds (Hodge, 2001;Read & Perez-Moreno, 2003), and depend primarily on saprotrophic microbiota to mineralize nutrients or liberate simple organic and inorganic compounds before uptake (Smith & Smith, 2011). However, the carbon costs of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis to plants may be higher than those of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (Leake et al, 2004;Hobbie, 2006;Brzostek et al, 2014;Lu & Hedin, 2019), in part because EMF produce greater amounts of biomass, as thick mantles covering the root tip and prolific extramatrical hyphae and rhizomorphs that allow more extensive soil resource exploitation and long-distance transport to the host plant (Smith & Read, 2008;Phillips et al, 2013). Because of the varying costs and benefits to trees of hosting EMF vs AMF, mycorrhizal mediated plant-soil feedbacks shape forest structure and dynamics (Corrales et al, 2016;Bennett et al, 2017;Corrales et al, 2018;Steidinger et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, AMF lack or have only limited enzymatic capacities to degrade organic compounds (Hodge, 2001;Read & Perez-Moreno, 2003), and depend primarily on saprotrophic microbiota to mineralize nutrients or liberate simple organic and inorganic compounds before uptake (Smith & Smith, 2011). However, the carbon costs of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis to plants may be higher than those of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (Leake et al, 2004;Hobbie, 2006;Brzostek et al, 2014;Lu & Hedin, 2019), in part because EMF produce greater amounts of biomass, as thick mantles covering the root tip and prolific extramatrical hyphae and rhizomorphs that allow more extensive soil resource exploitation and long-distance transport to the host plant (Smith & Read, 2008;Phillips et al, 2013). Because of the varying costs and benefits to trees of hosting EMF vs AMF, mycorrhizal mediated plant-soil feedbacks shape forest structure and dynamics (Corrales et al, 2016;Bennett et al, 2017;Corrales et al, 2018;Steidinger et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This characterization can be thought of in terms of functional traits, where the more evolutionarily ancient AM types co-evolved with the development of vascular plant roots (Feijen, Vos, Nuytinck, & Merckx, 2018;Hoysted et al, 2018;Selosse & Tacon, 1998) and confer an advantage for plant development when accessing any nutrients, but especially limited phosphorus. The other two types of important mycorrhizae (EM and ericoid mycorrhizae) arose later through convergent evolution (Tedersoo & Smith, 2013), and recent evidence from evolution-based trait modelling (Lu & Hedin, 2019) highlights saprotrophic ancestors that were able to metabolize less accessible organic nitrogen sources through the production of hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the relative number of legume species in Southeast Asia was lower than in the Neotropics and tropical Africa (Gentry, ), although he had many fewer plots in Southeast Asia than in the Neotropics. A recent study (Lu & Hedin, ) classified the taxa in Gentry's plots by N‐fixing status, but did not report patterns across continents. A study from the Center for Tropical Forest Science‐Forest Global Earth Observatory (CTFS‐ForestGEO) network—a network of large, mainly mature forest plots—showed that on average, legumes had a higher relative abundance in three plots in tropical Africa than in four plots in tropical America, which in turn had a higher relative abundance of legumes than in nine plots in tropical Asia (Losos & Leigh, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%