Global prevalence of nursing burnout syndrome and temporal trends for the last 10 years: A meta‐analysis of 94 studies covering over 30 countries

Abstract

Aims and ObjectivesTo determine the global prevalence of nursing burnout syndrome and time trends for the last 10 years.BackgroundThe prevalence of burnout syndrome varied greatly in different regions in the last 10 years, so the average prevalence and time trends of nursing burnout syndrome for the last 10 years were not completely clear.DesignA meta‐analysis conducted in the PRISMA guidelines.MethodsCINAHL, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched for trials on the prevalence of nursing burnout syndrome from 2012 to 2022 systematically. Hoy's quality assessment tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. The global prevalence of nursing burnout syndrome was estimated, and subgroup analysis was used to explore what caused heterogeneity. Time trends for the last 10 years were evaluated by meta‐regression using Stata 11.0.ResultsNinety‐four studies reporting the prevalence of nursing burnout were included. The global prevalence of nursing burnout was 30.0% [95% CI: 26.0%–34.0%]. Subgroup analysis indicated that the specialty (p < .001) and the region (p < .001) and the year (p < .001) were sources of the high heterogeneity. Meta‐regression indicated that it tended to increase gradually for the last 10 years (t = 3.71, p = .006). The trends increased in Europe (t = 4.23, p = .006), Africa (t = 3.75, p = .006) and obstetrics (t = 3.66, p = .015). However, no statistical significance was found in ICU (t = −.14, p = .893), oncology (t = −0.44, p = .691) and emergency department (t = −0.30, p = .783).ConclusionsA significant number of nurses were found to have moderate‐high levels of burnout syndrome for the last 10 years. The meta‐analysis also indicated an increased trend over time. Therefore, more attention to the prevalence of nursing burnout syndrome is urgently required.Relevance to Clinical PracticeHigh prevalence of nursing burnout may attract more attention from the public. This analysis may serve as an impetus for relevant policy to change nurses' working conditions and reduce the occurrence of burnout.

Burnout syndrome among healthcare professionals in the Fako division, Cameroon: Impact of physical activity and sleep quality

“…This could be due to the fact that all the health professionals were exposed to similar working conditions. Nevertheless, the prevalence of BOS found among nurses in our study was around two times higher than what was reported in a recent meta-analysis of 94 studies which found a 30% prevalence of BOS among nurses [32] . These contrary results can be explained by the fact that in Cameroon, nurses have a very important work load with around 0.67 nurses for 1000 patients [33] .…”

Nurse burnout before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic comparative review

“…From a theoretical perspective, this finding is consistent with Gee et al ( 55 ) who found that the nursing workforce was already at risk of burnout in previous years. A recent meta-analysis by Ge et al ( 56 )—including 94 studies covering over 30 countries—revealed that the global prevalence of nursing burnout syndrome over the past 10 years (from 2012 to 2022) was 30.0%, with significant heterogeneity influenced by specialty, region, and year. The prevalence tended to gradually increase during the COVID-19 pandemic, with more significant increases observed in Europe and Africa.…”

Moral Resilience Reduces Levels of Quiet Quitting, Job Burnout, and Turnover Intention among Nurses: Evidence in the Post COVID-19 Era

“…One of the longstanding issues of nurses' well-being, with significant consequences for both nurses and health care organizations, is burnout. It is estimated that burnout internationally affects one in three nurses [10]. Organizational characteristics that have been identified as risk factors for burnout include poor leadership with inadequate support for nurses, understaffing, lack of resources, decreased nurses' participation in hospital affairs, as well as workload and working longer hours [11][12][13].…”