2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04084-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global profiling of protein–DNA and protein–nucleosome binding affinities using quantitative mass spectrometry

Abstract: Interaction proteomics studies have provided fundamental insights into multimeric biomolecular assemblies and cell-scale molecular networks. Significant recent developments in mass spectrometry-based interaction proteomics have been fueled by rapid advances in label-free, isotopic, and isobaric quantitation workflows. Here, we report a quantitative protein–DNA and protein–nucleosome binding assay that uses affinity purifications from nuclear extracts coupled with isobaric chemical labeling and mass spectrometr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent study, a series of protein affinity pull-downs from nuclear lysates with oligonucleotide baits at different concentrations was combined with isobaric tandem-mass-tag labelling and mass spectrometry. This revealed apparent dissociation constants and binding profiles towards different G4 and transcription factor consensus sequences for hundreds of nuclear proteins in parallel [69].…”
Section: Natural G4-binding Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent study, a series of protein affinity pull-downs from nuclear lysates with oligonucleotide baits at different concentrations was combined with isobaric tandem-mass-tag labelling and mass spectrometry. This revealed apparent dissociation constants and binding profiles towards different G4 and transcription factor consensus sequences for hundreds of nuclear proteins in parallel [69].…”
Section: Natural G4-binding Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, various epigenetic and chromatin remodelling enzymes selectively bind DNA G4 oligomers [69] . Genomic binding sites of the chromatin remodelling protein ATR-X are enriched at GC-rich tandem repeats and CpG islands with the potential to fold G4 structures, and ATR-X loss is implicated with G4-dependent replication stress, DNA damage, and copy number alterations 53 , 82 .…”
Section: Natural G4-binding Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Top protein hits included mediators of histone modification, HMG chromatin architectural proteins, and histone chaperones (Box ). The same year, a new quantitative method for proteome‐wide profiling of DNA–protein and nucleosome–protein interactions was employed to identify the binding partners of the c‐Myc promoter G4 . Top protein hits included SMARCB1—a subunit of the chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 and embryonic ectoderm development—subunits of the PRC2, and GATAD2B, a subunit of NuRD .…”
Section: G4s Might Directly Engage Architectural Chromatin Proteins mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assays frequently use crude nuclear extracts, followed by either affinity purification of a TF of interest using antibodies or introduced protein tags such as GFP (8). Alternatively, nuclear extracts can be incubated with histone tails carrying a specific modification (34), reconstituted (un)modified nucleosomes (35), or a DNA sequence harbouring a specific DNA motif to identify the TFs that associate with this sequence (36)(37)(38). While these assays are informative to obtain DNA-binding specificity, histone (modification) binding potential, or to identify protein interaction partners, these assays have their limitations.…”
Section: Enrichment Of Localized Chromatin Compartmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%