2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020jd032371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Response of Evapotranspiration Ratio to Climate Conditions and Watershed Characteristics in a Changing Environment

Abstract: Understanding the complex relationship between evapotranspiration and climate conditions and land surface characteristics is important within the context of global warming and increasing anthropogenic stressors. Based on the Budyko theory, we derived general frameworks for describing how the evapotranspiration ratio (actual evapotranspiration/precipitation, AET/P) responds to changes in the aridity index (potential evapotranspiration/precipitation, PET/P) and watershed characteristics (m). The frameworks show … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identifying the contribution of climate change and vegetation coverage to ET change can help understand the causes of hydrological variations and explain the complex interactions between vegetation and climate. For this purpose, a number of attribution analyses have been conducted globally [1,21,[28][29][30], and several types of approaches have been used to investigate the linkage of ET and various driving variables. Field observations are commonly used to quantify the impacts of climate and vegetation on ET, such as eddy covariance techniques, porometry, and lysimeters, and scintillometry, but these observation methods only cover small areas at the site level with short time spans; thus, the response mechanisms depending on the multiple vegetation cover and long-term climate evolution at the regional scale cannot be completely reflected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying the contribution of climate change and vegetation coverage to ET change can help understand the causes of hydrological variations and explain the complex interactions between vegetation and climate. For this purpose, a number of attribution analyses have been conducted globally [1,21,[28][29][30], and several types of approaches have been used to investigate the linkage of ET and various driving variables. Field observations are commonly used to quantify the impacts of climate and vegetation on ET, such as eddy covariance techniques, porometry, and lysimeters, and scintillometry, but these observation methods only cover small areas at the site level with short time spans; thus, the response mechanisms depending on the multiple vegetation cover and long-term climate evolution at the regional scale cannot be completely reflected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we focused on the response of ET to vegetation change in the highly disturbed and diverse geographic and climatic region of the central interior of British Columbia, Canada. Based on the work of recent global studies (Berghuijs et al, 2017;Gudmundsson et al, 2016;Z. Liu et al, 2020;Wei et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2013;Zhou et al, 2015) and those in other areas such as China (Jiang et al, 2015;Ning et al, 2020;Shen et al, 2017;Tang & Wang, 2020;D.…”
Section: Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widely held interpretations of explicit curves representing individual catchment behaviour and the catchment-specific parameter representing biophysical/landscape features has led to the development of methods to determine the sensitivity of rainfall partitioning to climate and/or landscape changes for individual catchments (Roderick and Farquhar, 2011;Wang and Hejazi, 2011;Yang and Yang, 2011;Wang et al, 2016b;Zhou et al, 2016;Shen et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2016;Yeh and Tsao, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020;Sinha et al, 2020;Ning et al, 2020b;Liu et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020e;Li et al, 2020a;Liu et al, 2019a;Li et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2018; https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-584 Preprint. Discussion started: 13 November 2020 c Author(s) 2020.…”
Section: Current Interpretations Of Explicit Budyko Curves and The Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interpretation has motivated profound efforts to understand the relationship between biophysical features and catchment-specific parameters (Yang et al, 2007;Donohue et al, 2012;Yang et al, 2009;Shao et al, 2012;Li et al, 2013;Xu et al, 2013;Cong et al, 2015;Yang et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2018;Abatzoglou and Ficklin, 2017;Xing et al, 2018a;Zhao et al, 2020;Ning et al, 2020b;Li et al, 2020c;Li et al, 2020b;Zhang et al, 2019b;Ning et al, 2019;Bai et al, 2019). Numerous studies have also focused on determining the sensitivity of rainfall partitioning to climatic and/or land use changes (Roderick and Farquhar, 2011;Wang and Hejazi, 2011;Yang and Yang, 2011;Wang et al, 2016b;Zhou et al, 2016;Shen et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2016;Yeh and Tsao, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020;Sinha et al, 2020;Ning et al, 2020b;Liu et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020e;Li et al, 2020a;Liu et al, 2019a;Li et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2018;Xing et al, 2018b;Li et al, 2018;Xiangyu et al, 2020), as well as on deriving causal attribution to changes in this partitioning (Wang and Hejazi, 2011;Xing et al, 2018b;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%