The Cambridge Handbook of Service Learning and Community Engagement 2017
DOI: 10.1017/9781316650011.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Service Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a traditional approach to service-learning places the emphasis primarily on the "service" component, a more critical approach extends learning by developing experiences with a greater focus on equality and shared power between all participants (Mitchell, 2008). The consideration of power and privilege is one of the ways that global service-learning (GSL) stands apart from domestic or traditional service-learning activities (Hartman & Kiely, 2014).…”
Section: Global Service-learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a traditional approach to service-learning places the emphasis primarily on the "service" component, a more critical approach extends learning by developing experiences with a greater focus on equality and shared power between all participants (Mitchell, 2008). The consideration of power and privilege is one of the ways that global service-learning (GSL) stands apart from domestic or traditional service-learning activities (Hartman & Kiely, 2014).…”
Section: Global Service-learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the somewhat mundane level, volunteers might gain a new sense of efficacy and pride for having ‘made an impact’ or ‘given back’ (regardless of whether or not this is justified or accurate), or volunteers might gain a new experience which will help advance their educational or professional trajectories (Handler, 2013; O’Shea, 2014). On a more profound level, volunteers might receive a transformative learning experience: a new recognition of their social, economic and political privileges within an unequal world, a new appreciation of the ways in which their lives are entwined with the lives of others, and a new understanding of the moral and ethical obligations that such privilege and interdependence might demand of them (Crabtree, 2008; Hartman and Kiely, 2014; Mitchell, 2008). This sort of ‘gift’ from hosts to volunteers is arguably a net positive for individual volunteers and for the world at large, but it is not easily quantified and therefore not easily comparable to other ‘gifts’ that volunteers have given to hosts.…”
Section: Why Reciprocity and What Kind Of Reciprocity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches tend to position local partners in the role of passive recipient. A truly reciprocal exchange model, however, recognizes and prioritizes mutual benefit; neither partner is given primary concern or exclusive benefit; give and take is expected from both sides (Hartman et al ., 2014: 110; Palacios, 2010).…”
Section: Modalities Of Reciprocity In International Volunteeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations