2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global socio-economic and climate change mitigation scenarios through the lens of structural change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a first major result, we find that carbon pricing implies the risk of delaying the structural transformation process, mainly by increasing the cost of production and therefore changing the relative competitiveness of Indian manufacturing sectors over time compared to non-manufacturing Indian sectors as well as to manufacturing sectors in other countries. The development effect indicated by the decrease in manufacturing production goes beyond the secondorder impact found by Lefevre et al [25] in a global study, in which, due to a longer time horizon (until 2050), economies have more time to adapt. Changes in output and value-added shares can be expected to be large on a disaggregated manufacturing sector level (see figures A.9 and A.10 in the appendix), in particular in the fossil energy sector.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a first major result, we find that carbon pricing implies the risk of delaying the structural transformation process, mainly by increasing the cost of production and therefore changing the relative competitiveness of Indian manufacturing sectors over time compared to non-manufacturing Indian sectors as well as to manufacturing sectors in other countries. The development effect indicated by the decrease in manufacturing production goes beyond the secondorder impact found by Lefevre et al [25] in a global study, in which, due to a longer time horizon (until 2050), economies have more time to adapt. Changes in output and value-added shares can be expected to be large on a disaggregated manufacturing sector level (see figures A.9 and A.10 in the appendix), in particular in the fossil energy sector.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…We contribute by adding the structural change development perspective and find out that climate policy tends to slow down structural change. Only two other studies have a comparable focus-Lefevre et al [25] and Ciarli and Sanova [26]. The former, however, does not look into distributional effects on the household level as we do.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The eight models cover all the main modeling paradigms in the literature: 2 detailed-process IAMs, 2 bene t-cost IAMs, 3 Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models, and 1 macro-econometric model. The diversity in representing economic processes, in the solution concept, and the technological, sectoral and regional resolution is a primary added value of this modeling exercise, given the widely different results available in the literature on the economics of decarbonization (Köberle et al, 2021;Guivarch et al, 2022;Lefèvre et al, 2022). See the Methods section for details about the participating models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of the climate policy and structural change scenarios are discussed in the Introduction and Results sections. The pattern of structural change, as displayed in Figure 1 for the baseline scenario, also largely applies under different climate policy scenarios, implying that climate policies will not substantially change the macroeconomic structural transformation 37 .…”
Section: Scenario Designmentioning
confidence: 99%