2014
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/23/11/118904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global stability of a susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemic model on networks with individual awareness

Abstract: Global stability of a susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemic model on networks with individual awareness *Li Ke-Zan(李科赞) a) , Xu Zhong-Pu(徐忠朴) a) , Zhu Guang-Hu(祝光湖) a) , and Ding Yong(丁 勇) a)b) †

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This advancement further enhances the alignment of infectious disease dynamics research with real-world scenarios. In recent years, an increasing amount of research has been directed towards understanding the impact of population contact networks and their heterogeneity on the transmission of infectious diseases [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. In particular, Huo et al [ 22 ] introduced a fractional SIR model with birth and death rates on heterogeneous complex networks and analyzed both its local and global stability of disease-free and endemic equilibrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This advancement further enhances the alignment of infectious disease dynamics research with real-world scenarios. In recent years, an increasing amount of research has been directed towards understanding the impact of population contact networks and their heterogeneity on the transmission of infectious diseases [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. In particular, Huo et al [ 22 ] introduced a fractional SIR model with birth and death rates on heterogeneous complex networks and analyzed both its local and global stability of disease-free and endemic equilibrium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Received information will make individuals take self-protective actions to protect themselves. [17][18][19][20][21] Epidemic spreading on one layer will asymmetrically interact with the communication on another layer. [22,23] Objective traveling of choosing the shortest path will accelerate the epidemic spreading, [24][25][26][27][28] in contrast to the random diffusion model where individuals randomly choose one of its neighboring nodes for diffusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the literature dealing with the epidemic spreading behavior, the topology structure of the underlying network is assumed to be static. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] However, in practice, the relations between individuals are unlikely to keep unchanged all the time, the movements of individuals cause a dynamic topology structure. In fact, some recent study results indicate that the mobility of individuals can play a significant role in the epidemic spreading process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%