“…The dependence of X U (r) on q, k is clear: the larger q (or k) the smaller the set X U (r). However, the dependence of X U (r) on ω 1 ∈ (0, h * ) and ω 2 > 0 (through (45), (46), (49) and (50)), on β, γ, δ (through (17), (20), (32) and through the dependence of R on δ; see Remark 2.3) is not clear: it is a very complicated, non-monotonic dependence which cannot be described easily. When µ → 0 it holds that R → 0 (recall Remark 2.3) and consequently (since r ∈ [0, R)) r → 0.…”