2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global survey of lunar regolith depths from LROC images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our results are also in agreement with regolith thickness estimates from radar optical data (Shkuratov and Bondarenko, 2001), crater morphology (Bart et al, 2011;Fig. 6.…”
Section: Estimating the Regolith Porosity In The Vicinity Of The Impactssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, our results are also in agreement with regolith thickness estimates from radar optical data (Shkuratov and Bondarenko, 2001), crater morphology (Bart et al, 2011;Fig. 6.…”
Section: Estimating the Regolith Porosity In The Vicinity Of The Impactssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our LPR imaging results show that the thickness of the global lunar regolith layer was underestimated in previous studies (e.g., refs. 1,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the origin of this observation remains unclear a plausible explanation may be that surface modification exhumed more course subsurface materials to the surface as has been suggested as a possible explanation for Tsiolkovsky . Another is that Mare Humorum is interpreted to have one of the thinnest (median thickness of 2.5 m) mare basaltic regoliths [Bart et al, 2011] and boulders and blocks may have less vertical regolith in which to settle within over time. This may lead to larger boulders and blocks concentrating at the surface and near subsurface regolith.…”
Section: Implications and Use Of Refined Terrane Designations: Previomentioning
confidence: 99%