Global survey on disruption and mitigation of neurological services during COVID-19: the perspective of global international neurological patients and scientific associations

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak has dramatically disrupted healthcare systems. Two rapid WHO pulse surveys studied disruptions in mental health services, but did not particularly focus on neurology. Here, a global survey was conducted and addresses the impact of the pandemic on neurology services. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in which 34 international neurological associations were asked to distribute the survey to national associations. The responses represented the national situation, in November–December 2020, with regard to the main disrupted neurological services, reasons and the mitigation strategies implemented as well as the disruption on training of residents and on neurological research. A comparison with the situation in February–April 2020, first pandemic wave, was also requested. Findings 54 completed surveys came from 43 countries covering all the 6 WHO regions. Overall, neurological services disruption was reported as mild by 26%, moderate by 30%, complete by 13% of associations. The most affected services were cross-sectoral neurological services (57%) and neurorehabilitation (56%). The second wave of the pandemic, however, was associated with the improvement of service provision for diagnostics services (44%) and for neurorehabilitation (41%). Governmental directives were the major cause of services’ disruption (56%). Mitigation strategies were mostly established through telemedicine (48%). Almost half of respondents reported a significant impact on neurological research (48%) and educational activities (60%). Most associations (67%) were not involved in decision making for neurological patients’ issues by their national government. Interpretation The COVID-19 pandemic affects neurological services and raises the universal need for the development of neurological health care at the policy, systems and services levels. A global national plan on mitigation strategies for disruption of neurological services during pandemic situations should be established and neurological scientific and patients associations should get involved in decision making. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10641-3.

Telemedicine as a strategic intervention for cognitive rehabilitation in MS patients during COVID-19

“…Regarding the impact of COVID-19 on the cognitive aspects of MS [ 63 ], and the importance of early assessment and management of cognitive issues [ 39 ], attempts to implement the aforementioned applications have been increased. In fact, telemedicine has become the most established mitigation strategy [ 64 ]. In some instances, like patients with impaired impulse control or those who live far from clinical centers providing cognitive care, telemedicine could even be superior to in-person visits [ 65 ].…”

Medical dominos: impact of COVID-19 care on the health of the population

“…Author details 1 Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 820 Sherbrook Street, Room GF-222, Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9, Canada. 2 Department of Surgical Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir. On.S), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.…”

“…A virtually universal response to the pandemic has been to shift healthcare workers and other resources towards acute and ICU care of COVID-19 patients. It is clear that this has severely limited the ability of other domains of hospital care, and of outpatient clinics, to care for their patients [2,3]. (Online Supplement for: paragraph 2 Supplementary References.…”

“…Chronic diseases drive the majority of healthcare costs; over half of adults have a chronic disease, with over one-third having two or more of them [8]. The pandemic has interfered with medical services to people with cancer, heart disease, neurologic disorders, and other chronic conditions [2,9,10]. While reductions in unnecessary care may account for some of the observed decreases, we must have serious concern about if and how the pandemic has influenced relevant medical and psychosocial outcomes for the much larger populations of people with chronic conditions, or who develop such conditions but suffer delays in diagnosis due to the pandemic, or experience acute, time-dependent conditions.…”

Remote Delivery of Motor Function Assessment and Training for Clinical Trials in Neuromuscular Disease: A Response to the COVID-19 Global Pandemic

“…Within local and national health services, rapid adoption of approved telemedicine platforms facilitated video and telephone clinics ( Triki et al, 2021 ), removing need for many patients to attend face to face clinics whilst shielding. Standard of care assessments normally completed in the clinic required review and adaptation to ensure a patient’s progress continued to be monitored.…”