Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia

Abstract

The duplication of entire genomes has long been recognized as having great potential for evolutionary novelties, but the mechanisms underlying their resolution through gene loss are poorly understood. Here we show that in the unicellular eukaryote Paramecium tetraurelia, a ciliate, most of the nearly 40,000 genes arose through at least three successive whole-genome duplications. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that the most recent duplication coincides with an explosion of speciation events that gave rise to the P. aurelia complex of 15 sibling species. We observed that gene loss occurs over a long timescale, not as an initial massive event. Genes from the same metabolic pathway or protein complex have common patterns of gene loss, and highly expressed genes are over-retained after all duplications. The conclusion of this analysis is that many genes are maintained after whole-genome duplication not because of functional innovation but because of gene dosage constraints.Ciliates are unique among unicellular organisms in that they separate germline and somatic functions 1 . Each cell harbours two kinds of nucleus, namely silent diploid micronuclei and highly polyploid macronuclei. The latter are unusual in that they contain an extensively rearranged genome streamlined for expression and divide by a non-mitotic process. Only micronuclei undergo meiosis to perpetuate genetic information; the macronuclei are lost at each sexual generation and develop anew from the micronuclear lineage.In Paramecium the exact number of micronuclear chromosomes (more than 50) and the structures of their centromeres and telomeres remain unknown. During macronuclear development, these chromosomes are amplified to about 800 copies and undergo two types of DNA elimination event. Tens of thousand of short, unique copy elements (internal eliminated sequences) are removed by a precise mechanism that leads to the reconstitution of functional genes 2 .Transposable elements and other repeated sequences are removed by an imprecise mechanism leading either to chromosome fragmentation and de novo telomere addition or to variable internal deletions 3 . These rearrangements occur after a few rounds of endoreplication, leading to some heterogeneity in the sequences abutting the imprecisely eliminated regions 3 . The sizes of the resulting, acentric macronuclear chromosomes range from 50-1,000 kilobases (kb) as measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Because the sexual process of autogamy results in an entirely homozygous genotype 4 , the macronuclear DNA that was sequenced was genetically homogeneous.The Paramecium genome sequence The Paramecium macronuclear genome sequence was established with the use of a whole-genome shotgun and assembly strategy. Paired-end sequencing of plasmid and bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones provided a coverage of 13 genome equivalents (Supplementary Table S1). We assembled the sequence reads with Arachne 5 in 1,907 contigs connected in 697 scaffolds of size greater than 2 kb, giving a total coverage of 72...

Phylogenomic analyses reveal subclass Scuticociliatia as the sister group of subclass Hymenostomatia within class Oligohymenophorea

“…Omics data are available for relatively few ciliate taxa (Abernathy et al, 2007;Aeschlimann et al, 2014;Aury et al, 2006;Gentekaki et al, 2014;Ricard et al, 2008;Swart et al, 2013) and no omics data of scuticociliates were available hitherto. In the present study, the transcriptomes of five ciliates, including two representatives (Pseudocohnilembus persalinus and Paralembus digitiformis) of the subclass Scuticociliatia, were sequenced and phylogenetically analysed with 24 other taxa.…”

Large-scale phylogenomic analysis reveals the phylogenetic position of the problematic taxon Protocruzia and unravels the deep phylogenetic affinities of the ciliate lineages

“…One protistan group where such analyses have never been performed is the phylum Ciliophora. This is mainly because sufficient data exist for only a limited number of taxa (Abernathy et al, 2007;Aury et al, 2006;Ricard et al, 2008;Swart et al, 2013). Consequently, phylogenetic inference has been based largely on the 18S ribosomal RNA; however, a single locus is insufficient to infer robust phylogenetic relationships (Gribaldo and Philippe, 2000).…”

Soil eukaryotic functional diversity, a metatranscriptomic approach

“…The genome size of a eukaryote can be several orders of magnitude higher than the genome size of a bacterium. Among free-living unicellular eukaryotes it can vary from, for example, 13.8 Mpb for the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe with an estimated number of protein coding genes of 4800 (Wood et al, 2002) to 69 Mpb for the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia (39 600 gene models; Aury et al, 2006). As a consequence, it is unlikely that a workable metagenomic library based on genomic DNA can capture a significant fraction of the gene content of a eukaryotic microbial community.…”