Global urban sustainability assessment: A multidimensional approach

Abstract

A new strategic direction for greening our cities and making them smart to reduce the environmental impact of their performance, increase employment and economic viability, and to enhance the quality of life requires a thorough assessment of sustainability and smart urban performance. This paper considers a database of over 90 global cities including London, New York, Hong Kong, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Sao Paolo, Rio de Janeiro, Buenos Aires, Paris, Berlin, Stockholm, Moscow, Beijing, Seoul, Singapore, Shanghai, Sydney and Tokyo exploring linkages between different sustainability and smart city dimensions. To assess urban sustainability performance, this study applied a multi‐criteria approach using a panel of 20 indicators to a set of 57 global cities. The assessment comprised important aspects of energy transitions, focusing on the drivers of CO2 emissions in cities, including the share of coal in the energy mix, public transport and cycling patterns, waste recycling, the water‐energy nexus, as well as the role of smart and creative economy. The results show that San Francisco leads in economic and environmental priorities, and Stockholm leads in social and smart city priorities. Seoul consistently performs very successfully across the whole spectrum of indicators. We devote considerable attention to the strategies, policies and performance of the leading cities, namely, San Francisco, Stockholm and Seoul. This assessment could be a valuable tool for policy‐makers and investors, and could help identify linkages between different sustainability dimensions, as well as investment opportunities in cities with sustainability potential.

Are Local Authorities Building Their Capacity to Plan for Reduced Climate Impact? A Longitudinal Analysis of Swedish Comprehensive Plans

“…The municipality of Stockholm has been characterised as a leading city for climate action [65,66], and the conducted study confirms this forefront position concerning the integration of climate change mitigation aspects into spatial planning as well. It is indicated that Stockholm Municipality deems trans-national city networks to be essential for exchanging knowledge and best practices, a forum through which they will mainly collaborate with other pioneering cities [67].…”

A system thinking approach for harmonizing smart and sustainable city initiatives with United Nations sustainable development goals

“…System theory outweighs all other tools, because of its systematic behavior in integrating systems, the ability to predict composite changes within the system, and understanding the relevance of feasible divergence. Systems thinking addressed in context with smart cities considers socioeconomic and environmental characteristics and their dependencies with several systems and subsystems in a model that helps in strategic city planning (Shmelev & Shmeleva, 2018). This paves ways to SUD in smart cities (Pretorius et al, 2014 Thus, we can see that "policy and governance," "research & development" and "partnership" act as enablers, integrators, and connectors in harmonizing and linking smart city initiatives not only with SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) but also with other possible SDGs and smart city targets.…”

Learning Dispositif and Emotional Attachment: A Preliminary International Analysis

“…For Bottery [30] in dystopian university LDs, unhealthy practices include excessive VC salaries, unnecessary re-structuring, curricula shuffling, Kafkaesque bureaucracy or malicious investigations that mask malign impulses to power. In a similar but urban vein, Foucault [31] speculated that, in pathogenic as opposed to sustainable cities [32], intellectual 'medicalization' controls citizens [31] (p. 175). Notwithstanding dismissal of Foucault and other French intellectuals by Dawkins [33], his dispositif illuminates institutionalised suffering, psychological distress and social degradation endured by the learning underclass.…”