“…According to Corollary 3.7, the family (u ε ) ε∈(0,1) is bounded in L 4 3 ((0, T ); W 1, 4 3 (Ω)) for all T > 0 and, according to Lemma 3.8, the family (u εt ) ε∈(0,1) is bounded in L 1 ((0, T ); (W 1,4 (Ω)) * ) for all T > 0. Thus applying the Aubin-Lions lemma to the triple of spaces W 1, 4 3 (Ω) ⊂⊂ L 4 3 (Ω) ⊂ (W 1,4 (Ω)) * as well as the weak compactness property of bounded sets in Sobolev spaces for all T ∈ N combined with a diagonal sequence argument yields a null sequence (ε j ) j∈N and u : Ω × [0, ∞) → R such that (3.25) holds and such that u ε → u in L Similarly according to Lemma 2.2 and Corollary 3.7, the family (v ε ) ε∈(0,1) is bounded in the space L 4 ((0, T ); W 1,4 (Ω)) for all T > 0 and, according to Lemma 3.8, the family (v εt ) ε∈(0,1) is bounded in the space L 1 ((0, T ); (W 1,4 (Ω)) * ) for all T > 0. Given this, we can again apply the Aubin-Lions lemma to the triple of spaces W 1,4 (Ω) ⊂⊂ L 4 (Ω) ⊂ (W As we have now constructed our solution candidates, it remains only to be shown that they in fact fulfill our desired weak solution property and thus prove the second half of Theorem 1.1.…”