2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2017.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

#Globalhealth Twitter Conversations on #Malaria, #HIV, #TB, #NCDS, and #NTDS: a Cross-Sectional Analysis

Abstract: This study highlighted the specific #GlobalHealth Twitter conversations pertinent to malaria, HIV, tuberculosis, noncommunicable diseases, and neglected tropical diseases. These conversations reflect the priorities of advocates, funders, policymakers, and practitioners of global health on these high-burden diseases as they presented their views and information on Twitter to their followers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our prior research applied the same method to analyze Twitter users' responses to the WHO's declaration of Zika virus as a public health emergency of international concern, 10 as well as disease-specific contents on malaria, human immunodeficiency virus, tuberculosis, noncommunicable diseases and neglected tropical diseases in the context of Twitter #globalhealth conversations. 27 This study further demonstrates the feasibility of this approach. This is good news to many global health advocates, as their social media health communication efforts can be quantitatively measured and empirically evaluated, at least at the level of social media posts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Our prior research applied the same method to analyze Twitter users' responses to the WHO's declaration of Zika virus as a public health emergency of international concern, 10 as well as disease-specific contents on malaria, human immunodeficiency virus, tuberculosis, noncommunicable diseases and neglected tropical diseases in the context of Twitter #globalhealth conversations. 27 This study further demonstrates the feasibility of this approach. This is good news to many global health advocates, as their social media health communication efforts can be quantitatively measured and empirically evaluated, at least at the level of social media posts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Fung et al ( 38 , 39 ) used Twitter and performed a content analysis of the Malaria-related tweets ( 38 ). The main topics were: prevention, control, and treatment, followed by advocacy, epidemiological information, and societal impact.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also Pinterest and Instagram were exploited, however, only two studies were conducted and both of them performed a content analysis ( 39 , 53 ). Fung et al ( 38 , 39 ) analyzed more than 600 posts and photos on Facebook and Pinterest, respectively ( 39 ). The most popular topics were: prevention, pregnancy, and Zika-related deaths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Google web searches have been seen as an attractive data source for empirical research in the past, since people search for diseases, symptoms, and medical treatments [48]. Fung et al [76] analyzed the online discussion of major diseases (including tuberculosis, malaria, and HIV) using hashtags. They, however, did not study the relation to scientific papers regarding these diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%