2011
DOI: 10.1080/13563461003789795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalisation and Models of State: Debates and Evidence from Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This set of rules must be examined at a detailed level in order to understand the development of the normal working day. This article examines how the normal working day evolves during the last three decades by examining the development in legislation and in collective agreements in banking in three countries - Ireland, Norway andSweden -between 1980 and Ireland is traditionally seen as a liberal market economy (Hall and Soskice, 2001;Kirby and Murphy, 2011). After the introduction of social pacts in the 1990s, however, it was argued that Ireland should be classified as a more 'hybrid' type of country because of the new corporatist features (Vårheim, 2005;Wallace et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set of rules must be examined at a detailed level in order to understand the development of the normal working day. This article examines how the normal working day evolves during the last three decades by examining the development in legislation and in collective agreements in banking in three countries - Ireland, Norway andSweden -between 1980 and Ireland is traditionally seen as a liberal market economy (Hall and Soskice, 2001;Kirby and Murphy, 2011). After the introduction of social pacts in the 1990s, however, it was argued that Ireland should be classified as a more 'hybrid' type of country because of the new corporatist features (Vårheim, 2005;Wallace et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shift away from more established policy settings has been variously labelled as the rise of neoliberalism (Duggan, 2012; Harvey, 2005) and the emergence of a ‘workfare’ state (Peck, 2001; Peck and Jones, 1995). A reliance on new policy settings has been widely reported, with neoliberal policies employed in Europe (Kirby and Murphy, 2011), Australia (Argent, 2005), South Africa (Bond, 2000) and many other nations (Dingleday, 2007). The critique of neoliberalism has been challenged in a number of regions, with Ong (2006) arguing that in south-East Asia, neoliberalism is a ‘malleable’ technology of governance that has been adopted by different governments in different ways, assisting them to compete in global markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is acknowledged that the state in Ireland is similar to those in other jurisdictions in that it is a fluid, dynamic formation whose components shift over time. Furthermore, the discussion will not seek to supplant or disrupt some of the other models of the state which have evolved in recent years: for example, the notion that the state in Ireland can be viewed as a 'competition state' (Kirkby and Murphy, 2011). It is understood that the state in the Republic is a neoliberal state and its core function is to furnish an 'apparatus whose fundamental mission [is to] facilitate conditions for profitable capital accumulation on the part of both domestic and foreign capital' (Harvey, 2005: see also Allen, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%