2013
DOI: 10.1080/13569775.2013.804155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalisation before the crash: the City of London and UK economic strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Writing of the period of Labour in government from 1974–79, McIlroy argues that ‘scrutiny of Labour policies illustrates the need to see in Thatcherism continuity as well as change’ (1995: 192). It was a period during which successive Labour governments responded to the twin challenges of a global economic crisis and the growing transnationalisation of capital, with austerity programmes on the one hand, and proposals for a radical extension of social democracy and nationalisation on the other (Lambie, 2013). While the latter programme was more aspirational than real, it was the former austerity measures that provided some of the material policy precursors for the more widespread neoliberalisation of the Thatcher years.…”
Section: Labour and Neoliberalism Internationallymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Writing of the period of Labour in government from 1974–79, McIlroy argues that ‘scrutiny of Labour policies illustrates the need to see in Thatcherism continuity as well as change’ (1995: 192). It was a period during which successive Labour governments responded to the twin challenges of a global economic crisis and the growing transnationalisation of capital, with austerity programmes on the one hand, and proposals for a radical extension of social democracy and nationalisation on the other (Lambie, 2013). While the latter programme was more aspirational than real, it was the former austerity measures that provided some of the material policy precursors for the more widespread neoliberalisation of the Thatcher years.…”
Section: Labour and Neoliberalism Internationallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, there was considerable internal dissent within the Labour Party and the labour movement more generally to the government’s neoliberal austerity agenda. Significant sections of the movement coalesced behind radical social democratic/socialist forms of crisis response (Lambie, 2013). Moreover, the later admission by Callaghan in a BBC interview that the ‘IMF was a useful screen’ — by which he goes on to clarify that the conditionalities of the IMF gave the government cover for the austerity programme they felt necessary to implement anyway — suggests that he, and perhaps others in the Cabinet, felt neoliberal measures were necessary and enacted independent of any pressure brought to bear by the IMF (Cockerell, 1992).…”
Section: Labour and Neoliberalism Internationallymentioning
confidence: 99%