Globalisation in the defence industry: An exploration of the paradigm for us and European defence firms and the implications for being global players

Abstract

This paper explores some of the key issues associated with the restructuring of the defence industry. A comparison is made between the US and the European Defence Industrial Bases in terms of the drivers for change and the paradigms within which change has taken place. Having shown that some very important differences exist, the paper then explores the approaches that have been adopted for industry consolidation and references them to the academic literature on mergers and acquisitions (M&As) and strategic alliances (SAs). Given that most of the key defence players recognise the need to be global players, the paper presents an argument that the European firms' experience of operating with a wide range of forms of corporate alliance will serve them in good stead for operating on a global defence scale. US firms, in contrast, have focused largely on M&A activity.Globalisation, Defence industry restructuring, Strategic alliances, Change drivers in the defence industry,

The impact of defense expenditure on economic productivity in OECD countries

“…Countries should also collaborate with numerous countries that have strong defense industries base in the fields of tactical missiles, ground weapons, aircraft, shipbuilding, and satellites, to reduce the production cost, improve quality, and reinforce negotiation positions in international competition (Dowdy, 1999;Neal and Taylor, 2001).…”

Defying Convergence: Globalisation and Varieties of Defence-Industrial Capitalism

“…To compensate for the difficulties of producing sophisticated weapons, arms producers are globalising their supply chains, obtaining components from a range of foreign suppliers (Bitzinger 2003, Dowdall 2004, Brooks 2005. American and European defence contractors have engaged in waves of mega-mergers to achieve the scope and scale needed to develop contemporary weapons systems (Neal & Taylor 2001, Braddon 2004, Defying Convergence Gates 2004. As a consequence, today's defence multinationals possess human and financial resources outstripping those of many medium-sized states.…”

International armaments collaboration and the limits of reform

“…Within this context, Europe is the best region to study in order to ascertain different procedures' and institutions' impact on armaments collaboration (Neal and Taylor, 2001).…”