Globalization and Public Administration

Farazmand﻿, Ali

doi:10.2307/3110299

Cited by 262 publications

(139 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

126

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Public administration works for states, and when state regulations and protection tariffs are taken away, public administration territories are narrowed or "shrunk" (Farazmand, 1999). The role of government has decreased in the context of globalization (Farazmand, 1999).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Should Public Administration Be Internationalized

T.H¹

2016

UCPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Should Public Administration Be Internationalized

T.H¹

2016

UCPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Hence, there was little appreciation of the increasingly rule-bound nature of decentralized global governance system and interpenetration of rules in the domestic and international realm until the advent of globalization (Barnett & Sikkink, 2008). Similarly, it was globalization that led to a rethink of the boundaries of PAM beyond the state (Farazmand, 1999;Dunleavy, 1994;Klinger, 2004;Dator, Pratt, & Seo, 2006). New Public Management (NPM) was arguably internationalized in two ways: First, in theory, the internationalisation of NPM can be argued as the result of post Cold War dominance of US-led neo-liberal model (Washington Consensus which is pro-market and anti-state) (Gray, 1998;Minogue, 2001) and policy learning/transfer by bandwagoning countries supported by Information Communication Technology (ICT) and globalization.…”

Section: Figure 1 Historical Influences On Pam and Ir Theoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Value of Public Administration Management to International Relations: Scaffolding an Inter-Disciplinary Research Agenda

Rong¹,

Charles²

2015

IRD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

the theory and praxis for both disciplines. However, since then, the study of PAM and IR were separated in substance in what was called the "great divide" in IR, the presumption that domestic and international politics are distinct spheres that are defined by distinct organizing principles. Today, this "great divide" is being challenged with globalization. However, the attempt of looking at the domestic aspects of IR and international aspects of PAM stopped short of a deep inter-disciplinary discourse. Apart from labeling its international/global version of PAM and vice versa, the scope and objectives of this inter-discipline has been under-theorized. IR can be conceptually defined as how international affairs work while PAM as how [domestic] public affairs work. As such, both can be seen as applied social and policy sciences aimed at tackling public problems at different levels (international, regional and national/domestic). There are at least two complementary ways to build this inter-disciplinary discourse:(1) what can IR offer PAM; (2) what can PAM offer IR, before a research synthesis (Harris, 2010) effort to consolidate the similarities, differences and interesting aspects in order to lay a coherent foundation of PAM-IR inter-discipline. For reasons of scope and space, this essay attempts to explore the latter research question. PAM

show abstract

“…The effects of transformation towards the new world order were sighted by some authors as positive while others negative on the organizational environment in developing countries. (Bhagwati 2007, Farazmand 1999, Croucher 2003, Stiglitz 2002, Chossudovsky 1996.…”

Section: The Transformation Towards the New World Ordermentioning

confidence: 99%