2005
DOI: 10.1080/02680930500132239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalization, innovation, and the declining significance of qualifications led social and economic change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the reputations of universities like Stanford and MIT, as producers of information technology graduates, are likely to be based on their ability to produce graduates who hold competitive knowledge (i.e. knowledge that is not shared with competitors) (Strathdee 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the reputations of universities like Stanford and MIT, as producers of information technology graduates, are likely to be based on their ability to produce graduates who hold competitive knowledge (i.e. knowledge that is not shared with competitors) (Strathdee 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a variation of this argument, Strathdee (2005) sought to explain differences in the earnings of graduates from different kinds of universities by linking advantage to the production and transmission of innovative knowledge. The argument advanced in that paper was that the production of innovative knowledge was concentrated in elite universities.…”
Section: Human Capital Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the processes that give rise to this can also offer support to the critical account. For example, the concentration of innovative capacity in elite institutions can be conceived as an exclusionary practice (Strathdee 2005).…”
Section: Human Capital Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This literature is primarily concerned with raising critical questions about the NQF, rather than providing firm empirical answers to important questions (e.g. Black 2001;Irwin, Elley, and Hall 1995;Jordan and Strathdee 2001;Roberts 1997;Robson 1994;Sako 1999;Strathdee 2003Strathdee , 2004Strathdee , 2005aStrathdee , 2006. However, as described in more detail below, a growing number of empirical research papers have been published on the impact of the NQF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%