Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics 1999
DOI: 10.1093/0198295669.003.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalization, Liberalization, and Inequality: Expectations and Experience

Abstract: Explores the effects of moves from dirigiste to laissez‐faire policies (liberalization) on income distribution within countries, and also to consider briefly its impact on inter‐country inequality. The emphasis is on inequality within countries because this is where world inequalities have been most exacerbated over the past two decades. In itself, this represents an important change in inequality in world politics. The gap between rich and poor has long been the major source of inequality among people in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic reason for this fall is the rapid growth that has occurred in China and India in recent years. But this ignores some of the problems of PPP in general and China and India in particular cited earlier, as well as the rise in inequality within these, and most other countries in recent years (Stewart and Berry 1999;Wade 2002: 17-18;Milanovic 2002). It also ignores the increasing polarisation between the richest and poorest countries (and people) which, according to one study, increased sharply in the short five year period from 1988-93 (Milanovic 2002;Wade 2003: 27-8).…”
Section: Poverty and Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The basic reason for this fall is the rapid growth that has occurred in China and India in recent years. But this ignores some of the problems of PPP in general and China and India in particular cited earlier, as well as the rise in inequality within these, and most other countries in recent years (Stewart and Berry 1999;Wade 2002: 17-18;Milanovic 2002). It also ignores the increasing polarisation between the richest and poorest countries (and people) which, according to one study, increased sharply in the short five year period from 1988-93 (Milanovic 2002;Wade 2003: 27-8).…”
Section: Poverty and Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In popular and administrative commentary the influx of irregular migrants is represented as an illegitimate intrusion and therefore as a major threat to the sovereignty and security of the state (Teitelbaum and Weiner, 1995;Weiner, 1995;Zimmerman, 1995;Huntington, 2004). Fuelled by increasing economic divisions and insecurity of income within host societies and by the growth of far right antiimmigrant movements (Stewart and Berry, 1999;Ignazi, 2002), irregular migrants are targeted by populist and official rhetoric as threats to international order, labour market regulation, cultural homogeneity, social stability, welfare provision, services and infrastructure and personal security. Border policing has been dramatically upscaled and inter-governmentally coordinated, along with restrictive and punitive policies directed at irregular migrants and people-smugglers (Robinson, 1998;Lohrmann, 2000;Jordan and Düvell, 2002;Martin, 2003).…”
Section: Irregular Migrants and Reconfigured Practices Of Sovereigntymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the influence of the developed countries and especially through the policies exerted by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, underdeveloped countries went through "the same paradigmatic shift" with the First World (Stewart and Berry 1999). The Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) applied through the directions of the IMF and the World Bank had the same objectives in all the countries.…”
Section: Globalization Of the Third World And "Integration" Of Turkeymentioning
confidence: 99%