Globalization, National Identity, and Citizenship Education: China’s Search for Modernization and a Modern Chinese Citizenry

Abstract

Since the early 20th century, numerous scholars have proposed theories and models describing, interpreting, and suggesting the development paths countries have taken or should take. None of these, however, can fully explain China's efforts, mainly through education and citizenship education, to modernize itself and foster a modern citizenry since the late 19th century. This article traces and examines these efforts through a reflective and critical analysis of such public texts as official policy documents, curriculum standards, and related commentaries, and reveals three major findings. First, China's leaders have advanced different views of and approaches to development and citizenship in response to changing domestic and global contexts. Second, the Chinese state determines China's development course, defines its national identity and citizenry, and selects its nation-building curricula. Third, the Chinese state's growing desire for national rejuvenation in an increasingly competitive, globalized world in the 21st century mandates an important education mission that its citizenship education be politically and ideologically open and accommodative, and help students develop global, national and local identities and function as active, responsible citizens of a multileveled, multicultural world. This article furthers academic understanding of how China's education responds to economic, political, and social demands and shapes students' multiple identities in a global age.

Do the conditions in Chinese secondary school education imply a need for global citizenship education? An exploration of six secondary schools in Jiangsu

“…Song and Rao (2018) suggest developing the global perspectives based on socialist nationalism without highlighting the essential competencies, such as activism, for promoting the social equality aspect of socialist nationalism. Li (2009) proposes that GCE is an approach to participate in civil society not only within the country, but also at the international level, which coincides with the citizenship paradigm suggested in Republican China's synthesis 2016approach (Law 2013). Although these arguments in the local literature are narrated to favour a similar cosmopolitanism orientation (Wang 2019), the ideologies that underpin these arguments conflict with each other (e.g.…”

Characteristics, issues, and future directions in Chinese multicultural education: a review of selected research 2000–2018

“…A group of education theorists have claimed that national identity remains essential to CME, given its crucial role in maintaining social cohesion and reducing ethnic tensions (Qian 2010;Teng 2003;Wang 2005). Secondly, citizenship education enables students to both develop national identity and maintain their commitments to original ethnic communities (LAW 2013;Liu 2010;Zhang 2005Zhang , 2013. In doing so, citizenship education facilitates a balance between unity and diversity (Liu 2010;Zhang 2013).…”

Scrutiny of Global Citizenship in Chinese Elementary School English Textbooks and Teachers’ Practices during COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Another comparative study was conducted between Japanese and Chinese national curricula to explore how to advance the GCE agenda in the dominant national citizenship education (Chen, 2020). Since China's citizenship education is stateled, Chinese culture has always been an important part of China's citizenship education as well as a significant element of Chinese identity (Law, 2013). Moreover, Li (2021) carried out a case study to compare the implementation of GCE between Chinese rural and urban schools from teachers' perspectives, and the findings showed that teachers had a broad notion of GCE and disparities were identified between rural and urban schools.…”