2002
DOI: 10.1177/097185240200600203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalization, the Patriarchal State and Women's Resistance in Singapore

Abstract: This article explores the impact of globalization and the state policies on women in Singapore. It traces the trajectory of the government's globalizing policies and its deliberate use ofgender to counteract the perceived erosion of traditional social relations in the workplace and the home. Singaporean women have been economically marginalized and remain vulnerable in many respects, as the recent economic crisis has shown.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, ideology is more likely the reason for Singapore's quota nonadoption. The PAP is a socially conservative party that promotes pro-family policies based on the patriarchal view of the man as the head of the family and woman as the family's caregiver (Doran and Jose 2002; Haque 2000). Some of their infamous pro-family policies include a 30% university admission quota 1 that curbed the number of women medical students in the national medical school for 25 years and gave unequal citizenship rights and medical benefits to men and women 2 .…”
Section: Why No Gender Quota?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, ideology is more likely the reason for Singapore's quota nonadoption. The PAP is a socially conservative party that promotes pro-family policies based on the patriarchal view of the man as the head of the family and woman as the family's caregiver (Doran and Jose 2002; Haque 2000). Some of their infamous pro-family policies include a 30% university admission quota 1 that curbed the number of women medical students in the national medical school for 25 years and gave unequal citizenship rights and medical benefits to men and women 2 .…”
Section: Why No Gender Quota?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sterilisation requirement was removed, but the scheme, in its essence, remains in the current HOPE Scheme which serves the same purpose ("Reproductive Rights", 2015). These eugenicist policies were intended to "promote higher birth rates among educated Chinese women and to curtail prevailing rates among Malays and Indians" (Doran & Jose, 2002), reinforcing the gender, racial and class hierarchy in the country.…”
Section: Deference To Political Authority-reiterated Through East Asian Values That Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing the Challenge: This Special Issue While feminist scholars are beginning to interrogate the gendered impact of globalization (Doran and Jose, 2002; GTD, Vol. 3, No.…”
Section: Feminist Critiques Of Globalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ), the relationship between globalization theory and 'gender and development' scholarship is still unclear. As noted by Doran and Jose (2002), while it is obvious that gender relations are deeply implicated in the dynamics of globalization, within mainstream discussions of globalization there is scant acknowledgement of feminist work. Our ongoing task is to reveal the social, political, economic and cultural interplay between the very categories of the 'global' and the 'local' and their relationship to gender phenomena in their various manifestations (Chow, 2002: p. 4).…”
Section: Feminist Critiques Of Globalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation