2021
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.14361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globally Injective Geometry Optimization with Non‐Injective Steps

Abstract: We present a method to minimize distortion and compute globally injective mappings from non‐injective initialization Many approaches for distortion minimization subject to injectivity constraints require an injective initialization and feasible intermediate states. However, it is often the case that injective initializers are not readily available, and many distortion energies of interest have barrier terms that stall global progress. The alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) has recently gained t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, explicitly imposing injectivity in this formulation yields cubic constraints, making the numerical problem impossible to optimize with any existing solver. A variety of relaxed formulations that promote injectivity without strictly imposing it have been proposed over the years [AL13, KABL14, KABL15, FL16, SFL19, SLS22, ASGS22, NZZ20,OKN21,POK23,DAZ*20,GKK*21], often showcasing remarkable results even on extremely challenging tests. In Section 8, we tested the authors' implementation of [DAZ*20] on a portion of our dataset: in 34% of the cases it fails to produce an injective map.…”
Section: Field Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, explicitly imposing injectivity in this formulation yields cubic constraints, making the numerical problem impossible to optimize with any existing solver. A variety of relaxed formulations that promote injectivity without strictly imposing it have been proposed over the years [AL13, KABL14, KABL15, FL16, SFL19, SLS22, ASGS22, NZZ20,OKN21,POK23,DAZ*20,GKK*21], often showcasing remarkable results even on extremely challenging tests. In Section 8, we tested the authors' implementation of [DAZ*20] on a portion of our dataset: in 34% of the cases it fails to produce an injective map.…”
Section: Field Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, [Du et al 2020] introduces a novel total lifted content energy which has the property that its global minimum is an injective embedding, if one exists. [Overby et al 2021] proposes another method in this category. It demonstrates an impressive practical success rate for meshes with fixed connectivity and fixed boundary, but the existence of a solution or that a local minimum is found, is not guaranteed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the non-linear intersection-free constraint is not straightforward to handle, as the intersecting boundary edge pairs usually change during optimization. We note that computing intersectionfree and flip-free parameterizations without positional constraints is a popular research topic [10][11][12][13], while optimizing the positional constraints as a soft energy may lead to self-locking situations [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%