2003
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.54441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globally significant plants in southeastern Big Horn and southwestern Rosebud counties, Montana /

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Montana Natural Heritage Program botanists conducted surveys for these plants for Barton & Crispin, 2003). While only Wooly twinpod has been documented in the Hanging Woman basin, the habitat for these species is not uncommon in the area, and most likely exists in the basin; thus, there is a good chance that they could occur there.…”
Section: Plant Species Of Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Montana Natural Heritage Program botanists conducted surveys for these plants for Barton & Crispin, 2003). While only Wooly twinpod has been documented in the Hanging Woman basin, the habitat for these species is not uncommon in the area, and most likely exists in the basin; thus, there is a good chance that they could occur there.…”
Section: Plant Species Of Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Botanical surveys in Carter County (Vanderhorst et al 1998), surveys for globally significant plants in parts of Big Horn and Rosebud Counties (Barton and Crispin 2003), surveys in Hanging Women Basin in Big Horn County (Carlson and Cooper 2003), surveys for Astragalus barrii and Physaria didymocarpa var. lanata in parts of Big Horn and Rosebud Counties (Taylor and Caners 2002), plant Species of Concern in Powder River County (Heidel et al 2002), botanical survey of the Tongue River area (Heidel 1997), surveys for Quercus macrocarpa (Heidel 1993) and vascular plant surveys in the Pryor Mountain Desert (Lesica and Achuff 1992a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%