2008
DOI: 10.1002/art.23626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glomerular targets of nephritogenic autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although changes in the titers of these autoantibodies may reflect disease activity, their role in lupus pathogenesis remains unclear. These antibodies may bind to DNA or nucleosomes to form circulating ICs and the deposition of these complexes in the tissue may elicit inflammation [1,19,20]. In addition, a subset of pathogenic anti-dsDNA has been shown to penetrate living cells and derange the cell functions in vitro [4,13,21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although changes in the titers of these autoantibodies may reflect disease activity, their role in lupus pathogenesis remains unclear. These antibodies may bind to DNA or nucleosomes to form circulating ICs and the deposition of these complexes in the tissue may elicit inflammation [1,19,20]. In addition, a subset of pathogenic anti-dsDNA has been shown to penetrate living cells and derange the cell functions in vitro [4,13,21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the absence of any relationship between anti-MbA and anti-dsDNA Ab or antiC1q Ab suggests distinct, and probably complementary, mechanisms for these different nephritogenic autoAb. Indeed, anti-dsDNA Ab are suspected to deposit in the mesangial matrix (MM) of the glomeruli and to deposit, as the disease progresses, in the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) [28]. Anti-dsDNA Ab bind predominantly to exposed chromatin fragments released from apoptotic cells to form immune complexes present within electrondense structures in the MM and GBM [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50,51 However, more recent work shed light on this and suggest that at least some of the reported cross-reactivity can be explained by an indirect binding via nucleosomes. 52 It appears that when anti-DNA antibodies cross-reactive to HS proteoglycans (HSPG) are treated with DNase I, the binding to HSPG is abolished. More detailed analysis revealed that the anti-DNA antibodies bound nucleosomes, derived from the dying hybridoma cells and the binding to HSPG was mediated by these nucleosomes.…”
Section: Cross-reactivity Of Anti-dna Autoantibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%