Archaeologies of Memory 2003
DOI: 10.1002/9780470774304.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glories of the Past in the Past: Ritual Activities at Palatial Ruins in Early Iron Age Crete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as opposed to James . Regarding the transmission of architectural details from an earlier period, see Prent's (2003; 2004) work on ruin cults in Crete as creating a context for preserving the cultural knowledge about Minoan architecture. The threshold with door sockets for double doors in Temple 650 is an Assyrian feature as is the great hall: the long, narrow rectangular room reconstructed as connecting to the ante‐room for the throne room (Gitin et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as opposed to James . Regarding the transmission of architectural details from an earlier period, see Prent's (2003; 2004) work on ruin cults in Crete as creating a context for preserving the cultural knowledge about Minoan architecture. The threshold with door sockets for double doors in Temple 650 is an Assyrian feature as is the great hall: the long, narrow rectangular room reconstructed as connecting to the ante‐room for the throne room (Gitin et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By honouring it, they accomplished one of the first actions of a state‐organized settlement. As such it would illustrate a theory originally proposed by Alcock (1991), and more recently adapted for Crete in particular by Prent (2003; 2005) and Wallace (2003; 2010 3 ) that the reuse of or devotion to Late Bronze Age settlements or cemeteries was a way of constructing an identity based on the past and promoting the historical continuity of the community. It can then be no coincidence that such a reverence for the past occurred at Lato, which would develop into a major polis, and not at the other Late Bronze Age sites in its vicinity such as the settlements at Kritsa Kastello (Nowicki 2000, 120–3), Tapes Kato Kastello (Nowicki 2000, 123–5), Tapes Epano Kastello (Nowicki 2000, 115–27) and Adrianos Fortetsa (Nowicki 2000, 117–19), the tombs at Kritsa (Platon 1951; 1953), or the sanctuary on Thylaka (Reinach 1913; Sakellarakis 1970; Davaras 2010).…”
Section: Early Evidence For the Process Of City‐state Formation At Latomentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Prent (2003, 90) and Lefèvre‐Novaro (2004, 191) have argued that the different cults observed during the G period on Late Bronze Age sites or at visually impressive monuments were typical of small groups of worshippers, to whom association with the past would have been a mark of social distinction. This phenomenon was sometimes interpreted as reflecting a claim for power and authority by rising aristocratic groups (Prent 2003). This, however, seems to conflict with the situation as illustrated at Lato.…”
Section: Early Evidence For the Process Of City‐state Formation At Latomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For groups with no written language, objects and places play an outsized role in this construction. Although social memory is often seized by elite or socially powerful groups to legitimize their claim to power and authority (Gillespie 2008;Prent 2003;Sinopoli 2003), its role within any social group-family, religious, or taskbased-is vital to the group's and the individual's identity. However, choosing what is to be remembered or forgotten structures our continuing relationship with the material world (Erll 2011).…”
Section: Closure Dedication and Social Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%