1972
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1972.32.4.460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glottis opening and airway resistance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
1
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pmo may be measured during inspiration or expiration. In this study, Pmo was measured during inspiration, as differences in glottic opening are more likely to affect measurements during expiration [16]. Several principles have been suggested for estimating the alveolar pressure from the Pmo recording [17].…”
Section: Rintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pmo may be measured during inspiration or expiration. In this study, Pmo was measured during inspiration, as differences in glottic opening are more likely to affect measurements during expiration [16]. Several principles have been suggested for estimating the alveolar pressure from the Pmo recording [17].…”
Section: Rintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Raw* and Raw,pleth are measured at different frequencies and under different conditions of breathing pattern and airway flow. The panting manoeuvre produces larger flow, hence larger resistance value, than quiet breathing, but this is probably cancelled by the fact that panting also increases the glottic aperture [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In normal subjects upper airway resistance falls slightly as respiratory frequency is increased (Spann & Hyatt, 1971) and as panting volume is reduced (Stanescu et al, 1972) the latter probably because of reduced turbulence. However, when panting was compared to quiet breathing in the body plethysmograph there was no difference in Raw in normal subjects ) though a small reduction (12%) was seen in patients with chronic bronchitis similar to that seen in a similar group of patients by Barter & Campbell (1973).…”
Section: Body Plethysmographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique of the subject may be important since panting has been shown to reduce the difference in Raw between inspiration and expiration (Stanescu et al, 1972) and repeated measurements may lead to a training effect with improved reproducibility .…”
Section: Body Plethysmographymentioning
confidence: 99%