2019
DOI: 10.1101/730408
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, exendin-4, reduces reinstatement of heroin seeking behavior in rats

Abstract: Background

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(106 reference statements)
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepant results in the self‐administration paradigm may indicate species differences between rats and mice. Indeed, another rat study reported that exenatide reduced responding for cues previously associated with heroin injections in a reinstatement procedure of operant behaviour (Douton et al, 2021). Treatment with the selective DPP‐4 inhibitor linagliptin was also reported to reduce morphine‐conditioned place preference and facilitate extinction of the morphine preference in rats (Łupina et al, 2020).…”
Section: Role Of Glp‐1 In Substance Use Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrepant results in the self‐administration paradigm may indicate species differences between rats and mice. Indeed, another rat study reported that exenatide reduced responding for cues previously associated with heroin injections in a reinstatement procedure of operant behaviour (Douton et al, 2021). Treatment with the selective DPP‐4 inhibitor linagliptin was also reported to reduce morphine‐conditioned place preference and facilitate extinction of the morphine preference in rats (Łupina et al, 2020).…”
Section: Role Of Glp‐1 In Substance Use Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanisms involving some form of satiation would be consistent with the known effects of GLP‐1 system stimulation on the regulation of nutrient intake. However, several studies have reported that GLP‐1 receptor stimulation can suppress drug‐conditioned behaviours, in both classical conditioning (CPP procedures) and operant conditioning (drug seeking using reinstatement procedures), that is, tests during which the drug is unavailable (Douton et al, 2021; Egecioglu, Steensland, et al, 2013; Egecioglu, Engel, & Jerlhag, 2013a, 2013b; Graham et al, 2013; Harasta et al, 2015; Hernandez et al, 2018, 2019, 2020; Shirazi et al, 2013; Sirohi et al, 2016; Vallöf et al, 2016; Vallöf, Kalafateli, et al, 2019; Vallöf, Vestlund, et al, 2019). This would suggest that GLP‐1 receptor stimulation also modulates mechanisms underlying drug and alcohol ‘seeking’ or ‘wanting’, and not only intake and satiation.…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is yet unknown that whether this gene delivery platform can reduce reinstatement induced by drug-associated cue or stress. Exendin-4, a GLP1R agonist, can reduce cue-induce heroin-seeking in a self-administration model [ 42 ]. Whether skin-derived GLP1 can reduce cue-elicited drug-seeking needs to be addressed in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impaired ability of post‐escalation AIC‐lesioned rats to reach a stable higher plateau of heroin intake when given extended access may reflect disrupted drug satiety (Steidl, Myal, & Wise, 2015) in an allostatic state in which intake is regulated and maintained around an elevated baseline (Koob & Moal, 1997). The reinforcing and motivational properties of opiates have been shown to depend on systemically released peptides involved in food satiety (Douton et al., 2019) and acute food restriction‐induced heroin seeking depends on leptin and ghrelin (D'Cunha, Chisholm, Hryhorczuk, Fulton, & Shalev, 2020; Shalev, Yap, & Shaham, 2001). Chronic exposure to opiates triggers long‐term adaptations in satiety‐controlling (Duraffourd et al., 2012), enteric neurons (Duraffourd, Kumala, Anselmi, Brecha, & Sternini, 2014) that project via visceral afferent pathways to the insula (Mayer, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%