1987
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4731(87)90001-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucocorticoid receptors bound to the antagonist RU486 are not downregulated despite their capacity to interact in vitro with defined gene regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One piece of this puzzle is the question of whether or not ligands modulate the interactions between GR and specific DNA recognition sites. Methods including gel-shifts, gradient sedimentation, and footprinting have been used to measure the allosteric effects of ligands on the interactions between GR and DNA in vitro; however, these studies have led to contradictory results (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Importantly, each observation is distinct with respect to the choice of ligand, DNA promoter site, and method of detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One piece of this puzzle is the question of whether or not ligands modulate the interactions between GR and specific DNA recognition sites. Methods including gel-shifts, gradient sedimentation, and footprinting have been used to measure the allosteric effects of ligands on the interactions between GR and DNA in vitro; however, these studies have led to contradictory results (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Importantly, each observation is distinct with respect to the choice of ligand, DNA promoter site, and method of detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, studies indicate that hormones are not required for stable GR binding to DNA in vitro (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Specifically, complexes of agonist triamcinolone acetonide and antagonist RU486 bound to GR have a comparable affinity for glucocorticoid response elements from different promoters (14 -16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a protocol developed in the laboratories of S. Akana and Dr. Mary Dallman at the University of California-San Francisco (2,29). After the binding of either Cort or Mif to the GR, the ligand-receptor complex translocates to the nucleus (14,38). With the use of a rabbit anti-GR antibody (PA1-511, Affinity Bioreagents) that has higher affinity for the occupied than for the unoccupied GR, dark punctate nuclear staining is observed when either Mif or Cort is bound to the receptor (i.e., in the presence of ligand), whereas in the absence of ligand the staining is weaker and more diffuse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mif and corticosterone both bind to the GR and cause the subsequent translocation of the ligand-bound receptor from the cytoplasm to the nucleus (22,45). We previously used immunohistochemical identification of GR to demonstrate that 4 days of treatment with DHB Mif or corticosterone caused nuclear translocation of the GR within the DHB, but not in the ventral hindbrain or the forebrain (55).…”
Section: Assessment Of Brain Mif Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%