Adrenal insufficiency (AI) comprises a group of rare diseases, including primary AI, secondary AI, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia. [1,2] Glucocorticoid (GC) replacement is the cornerstone therapy in the management of AI, intended to prevent life-threatening complications related to AI and improve the well-being and quality of life in patients with AI.Adrenal crisis is a grave complication of AI, occurring even in subjects on regular GC replacement. The incidence of adrenal crisis is estimated at 5-10 per 100 patient-years, with a mortality of 0.5 per 100 patient-years. [3] The primary trigger identified for the development of adrenal crisis is a delay in increased GC dose in cases of infection. [4,5] Patient education is essential to gain the skills needed to prevent acute impairment of their AI disorder. [6,7] Furthermore, previous findings suggest that the treating physicians are the patients' primary source of information regarding AI (89%). Professional healthcare workers are essential for sharing knowledge and advice regarding the various aspects of managing the disease. [8] However, a debate exists on whether physicians' knowledge regarding AI is sufficient, in part due to the rareness of this endocrine disorder. [9][10][11][12] Significant barriers to diagnosis and management of AI were identified in some developing regions of the world with indicators of tiered healthcare that may expose deficiencies in management. [13,14] Therefore, we aimed to examine AI management's current knowledge and perceptions among a sample of physicians from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and in various specialties. Our long-term goal is to identify critical deficiencies in AI Introduction: Treatment of adrenal insufficiency (AI) requires correct lifelong use of glucocorticoids (GCs) with early dose adjustments to cover the increased demand in stress to avoid life-threatening emergencies. Objectives: We determine the current specific knowledge of physicians in a convenience sample on the pathophysiological and clinical aspects of AI in the two regions of North Africa and the Middle East. Materials and Methods: Participants (n = 96) were invited to complete an electronic questionnaire with various possible answers on the subject of multiple-choice questions covering physiology, pharmacology, and clinical management and define respondents' professional profiles. Results: The present study suggests that in the investigated settings, physicians' knowledge of physiology and pharmacology GCs, medical replacement strategies in AI, and prevention of adrenal crisis may be insufficient. Great knowledge gaps were demonstrated. Conclusions: There is a need for continuous structured education and training on AI in both general medical and endocrine forums.