1965
DOI: 10.1136/gut.6.4.387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucose and fructose absorption in idiopathic steatorrhoea.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
17
0
1

Year Published

1967
1967
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ifthe assumptions ofthe simulation are correct, then the difference between the active coeliac anid control groups cannot be explained solely by difference in unstirred layer thickness, but also incorporates an approximate four-fold difference in Jmax. 873 N. W. Read, D. C. Barber, R. J. Levin, and C. D. Holdsworth remain fixed at 5 mM, the separation between the active coeliac and the normal group would indicate an approximately four-fold difference in Jmax corresponding to that estimated experimentally in man (Schedl and Clifton, 1961;Holdsworth and Dawson, 1965).…”
Section: Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ifthe assumptions ofthe simulation are correct, then the difference between the active coeliac anid control groups cannot be explained solely by difference in unstirred layer thickness, but also incorporates an approximate four-fold difference in Jmax. 873 N. W. Read, D. C. Barber, R. J. Levin, and C. D. Holdsworth remain fixed at 5 mM, the separation between the active coeliac and the normal group would indicate an approximately four-fold difference in Jmax corresponding to that estimated experimentally in man (Schedl and Clifton, 1961;Holdsworth and Dawson, 1965).…”
Section: Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The lines are clearly well separated confirming that the differences in Apparent Km between the active coeliac and control group clearly cannot be explained by the changes in the thickness of the unstirred layer alone. Moreover, if we accept that the Jmax in coeliac disease is only a fraction of that in health (Schedl and Clifton, 1961; Holdsworth and Dawson, 1965), then it is unnecessary to postulate any change in the real affinity of the glucose carrier …”
Section: Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those amino acids which reach the large intestine are decarboxylated, transaminated or chemically altered by bacterial enzyme action. A very marked impairment in the rate of monosaccharide absorption has been demonstrated in adult coeliac disease when the jejunal mucosa is damaged (Holdsworth & Dawson, 1965); a similar impairment in the rate of amino acid absorption probably exists. The mucosa is damaged in severe malnutrition; in Kwashiorkor changes of the jejunal mucosa, which are associated with a greatly decreased absorptive area, have been demonstrated (Burman, 1965;Stanfield, Hutt & Tunnicliffe, 1965).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So beruht die reduzierte K ohlenhydratausnutzung sowohl au f einem Unverm ö gen, M onosaccharide zu resorbieren, als auch au f einem Mangel an Disaccharidasen in der D arm schleim haut [6,28,29, 33,47,48,49,57,59].…”
unclassified