2005
DOI: 10.1101/lm.88205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucose injections into the dorsal hippocampus or dorsolateral striatum of rats prior to T-maze training: Modulation of learning rates and strategy selection

Abstract: The present experiments examined the effects of injecting glucose into the dorsal hippocampus or dorsolateral striatum on learning rates and on strategy selection in rats trained on a T-maze that can be solved by using either a hippocampus-sensitive place or striatum-sensitive response strategy. Percentage strategy selection on a probe trial (P crit ) administered after rats achieved criterion (nine of 10 correct choices) varied by group. All groups predominately exhibited a response strategy on a probe trial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although systemic administration of glucose has been suggested to modulate memory via this peripheral mechanism, it has been shown that extracellular hippocampal glucose concentration decreases in rats when they perform a spatial navigation task, suggesting a central mechanism of action for glucose (McNay et al, 2000). Consistent with this suggestion, a few studies have indicated that direct injection of glucose into specific brain structures (e.g., amygdala or the hippocampus) can facilitate memory (Ragozzino and Gold, 1994;Ragozzino et al, 1998;Schroeder and Packard, 2003;Canal et al, 2005;Krebs and Parent, 2005). It is thought that centrally applied glucose may facilitate memory formation by restoring cellular energy levels that were reduced as a result of learning and/or by increasing the release of acetylcholine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although systemic administration of glucose has been suggested to modulate memory via this peripheral mechanism, it has been shown that extracellular hippocampal glucose concentration decreases in rats when they perform a spatial navigation task, suggesting a central mechanism of action for glucose (McNay et al, 2000). Consistent with this suggestion, a few studies have indicated that direct injection of glucose into specific brain structures (e.g., amygdala or the hippocampus) can facilitate memory (Ragozzino and Gold, 1994;Ragozzino et al, 1998;Schroeder and Packard, 2003;Canal et al, 2005;Krebs and Parent, 2005). It is thought that centrally applied glucose may facilitate memory formation by restoring cellular energy levels that were reduced as a result of learning and/or by increasing the release of acetylcholine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In addition, it has been demonstrated that age-related memory impairments in rodents can be reversed by injection of glucose near the time of training (Messier and Destrade, 1988;McNay and Gold, 2001). Although it is thought that the memory-enhancing effect of systemic glucose administration is mediated by peripheral release of epinephrine, this mechanism is not consistent with memory enhance-ment that is seen after intrahippocampal or intra-amygdalal glucose infusion (Ragozzino and Gold, 1994;Li et al, 1998;Ragozzino et al, 1998;Schroeder and Packard, 2003;Canal et al, 2005;Krebs and Parent, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Competition between two memory systems (and hence, the corresponding strategies) is demonstrated when a lesion of one of the systems entails an improvement of the learning of the other, while cooperation implies that such a lesion leads to the impairment of the other system's performance (Kim and Baxter 2001;Gold 2004). In the spatial domain, competition or cooperation between navigational strategies are respectively observed when one of the strategies perturbs (Packard and McGaugh 1992;Pearce et al 1998;Chang and Gold 2003;Canal et al 2005) or facilitates (McDonald and White 1994;Hamilton et al 2004;Voermans et al 2004) the other one for reaching the goal. The analysis of switching between place-and response-based strategies suggests that they can interact both across and within experimental trials (Pearce et al 1998;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-training lDS injections of artifi cial cerebral spinal fl uid (Canal et al, 2005), and post-training injections of glutamate into the lDS (presumed to induce striatal activation; Packard, 1999) have been shown to increase the use of the response strategy in very similar procedures. Such an effect could thus be interpreted as resulting from a lDS dysfunction due to intra striatal injections.…”
Section: Effects Of Lds Lesions In the Strategy Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies have shown that the use of place and response strategies early in training depends largely on intra-and extra-maze cue arrangements and densities (Tolman et al, 1946(Tolman et al, , 1947Restle, 1957;Oliveira et al, 1997;Passino et al, 2002;Canal et al, 2005). The capacity to use environmental cues to drive the behaviour (i.e.…”
Section: The Use Of Place Versus Response Strategies Early In Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%